I have two matrices
$$ \begin{pmatrix}
2 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 2 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 3
\end{pmatrix} $$
and $$ \begin{pmatrix}
2 & 2 & 0 \\
0 & 2 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 3
\end{pmatrix} $$
They are not diagonalizable. Share the same characteristic polynomial, the same trace, same determinant, eigenvalues, rank. What could I use more to say if they are similar or not?
Answer
Although using Jordan Canonical forms are probably the fastest answer, it is possible to solve this question using brute force. We want to find out if there is an invertible matrix $P$ such that
$$P \cdot
\begin{pmatrix}
2 & 1 & 0\\
0 & 2 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 3
\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}
2 & 2 & 0\\
0 & 2 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 3
\end{pmatrix} \cdot P.$$
Denoting
$$P = \begin{pmatrix}
a & b & c\\
d & e & f\\
g & h & i
\end{pmatrix}$$
this is equivalent with stating that
$$\begin{pmatrix}
2a & a + 2b & 3c\\
2d & d + 2e & 3f\\
2g & g + 2h & 3i
\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}
2a + 2d & 2b + 2e & 2c + 2f\\
2d & 2e & 2f\\
3g & 3h & 3i
\end{pmatrix}.$$
Comparing corresponding entries, we find that:
$$\begin{cases}
2a = 2a + 2d\\
a + 2b = 2b = 2e\\
3c = 2c + 2f\\
2d = 2d \\
d + 2e = 2e\\
3f = 2f\\
2g = 3g\\
g + 2h = 3h\\
3i = 3i
\end{cases}.$$
This is equivalent with
$$\begin{cases}
d = 0\\
a = 2e\\
c = 2f\\
0 = 0\\
e = e\\
f = 0\\
g = 0\\
h = 0\\
3i = 3i
\end{cases}.$$
And from equation 3 and 6, we also have that $c = 0$. Therefore, we find that
$$a = 2e, b = b, c = 0, d = 0, e = e, f = 0, g = 0, h = 0, i = i,$$
so we can take $b = 0$ and we find that
$$P = \begin{pmatrix}
2 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 1 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 1
\end{pmatrix}$$
since we had a free choice for $b, i$ but we want $P$ to be invertible, so we can't take $i = 0$ (but any other value will do) and we take $b = 0$ (so $P$ is clearly invertible).
So this is a way to find out if both matrices are similar or not (if you would have found a contradiction in the system, then they are not (or if the resulting matrix $P$ is not invertible they are also not similar). However, as I already mentioned: if you know about Jordan canonical form, always use this approach, since it is clearly much shorter!
No comments:
Post a Comment