Tuesday, 12 May 2015

combinatorics - Algebraic proof of a binomial sum identity.



I came across this identity when working with energy partitions of Einstein solids. I have a combinatorial proof, but I'm wondering if there exists an algebraic proof.
$$\sum_{q=0}^N\binom{m + q - 1}{q}\binom{n + N - q - 1}{N - q} = \binom{m + n + N - 1}{N}$$

I've tried induction, but Pascal's Identity cannot simultaneously reduce the top and bottom argument for an inductive proof.



For those interested, a combinatorial proof of the identity can be given as follows: Consider the ways of distributing $N$ quanta of energy to a system of $n + m$ oscillators (where each oscillator can have any number of quanta). This is equivalent to the question of asking how many ways of putting $N$ objects into $n + m$ boxes. From the traditional stars and bars method, the total is given by
$$\binom{m + n + N - 1}{N}$$
which is the right-hand side. Alternatively, consider partitioning the units of energy between the first $m$ and the last $n$ oscillators. Give $q$ units of energy to the first $m$ oscillators. Then there remains $N - q$ units of energy for the latter $n$. Together, the number of states for this particular partition is
$$\binom{m + q - 1}{q}\binom{n + N - q - 1}{N - q}$$
Summing over all partitions gives the left-hand side.



Thanks for your time.


Answer




Let $$f_n(z)=\sum_{q=0}^\infty \binom {n+q-1}q z^q$$



Claim: This is $(1-z)^{-n}$.



Then $f_n(z)f_m(z) = f_{n+m}(z)$. But the left hand side of your formula is the coefficient of $z^N$ in $f_n(z)f_m(z)$, and the right hand side is the coefficient of $f_{n+m}(z)$.



The proof of the claim is the generalized binomial expansion, and uses the fact that $$\binom {-n} q = (-1)^q \binom {n+q-1}{q}$$



Alternatively, you can rewrite your statement as:




$$\sum_{q=0}^N \binom {-m} q \binom {-n}{N-q} = \binom {-(m+n)}q$$


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find $lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}$

How to find $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h}$ without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...