Sunday, 25 September 2016

number theory - How does one get that 13+23+33+43+cdots=frac1120?




While watching interesting mathematics videos, I found one of the papers of Srinivasa Ramanujan to G.H.Hardy in which he had written 13+23+33+43+=1120.



The problem is that every term on the left is more than 1120 yet the sum is 1120. How is that ???




I know that there are many and much more interesting things presented by Ramanujan (like 11+11+1...=12 and 1+2+3+4.....=112) but for now I am interested in the summation in the title.
Any idea/hint is heartily welcome. Thanks.



Here is the video I'm talking about.


Answer



I think I have rediscovered it (after watching the video you linked and read wiki biography of Ramanujan).



Start with 1x+1=1x+x2x3+,|x|<1.

and differentiate to get 1(x+1)2=1+2x3x2+4x3+,|x|<1.2(x+1)3=2132x+43x2+,|x|<1.6(x+1)4=321+432x543x2+,|x|<1.



Take a magic mushroom and, ignoring |x|<1, let us take x=1 in each one. 12=11+11+14=1+23+4+14=2132+43+38=321+432543+

Or more formally, m=1(1)m+1m=14.m=1(1)m+1m(m+1)=14.m=1(1)m+1m(m+1)(m+2)=38.



But notice m=1(1)m+1m2=m=1(1)m+1m(m+1)m=1(1)m+1m=1414=0.

and m=1(1)m+1m3=m=1(1)m+1m(m+1)(m+2)3m=1(1)m+1m22m=1(1)m+1m=3830214=18




On the other hand, ζ(3):=13+23+33+24ζ(3)=223+243+263+

Subtract them, aligning the 2nd, 4th, 6th term like Ramanjunan did in his notebooks (shown in the video). 15ζ(3)=1323+33+
and together give us: (Hold your breath.) m=1m3=1120.



Recently I also found a proof of Riemann conjecture, but the answer box is too narrow for me to type all that down.




P.s. seriously, I think Ramanujan's effort is sort of finding an interpretation of divergent series so that they have a real value, while their manipulation to be still consistent to our usual notion of arithmetics: arranging, addition, expanding, etc.?
Maybe this can be compared to the attempt to define quaternion as an extension of complex numbers, while inevitably discarding commutative law?


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...