Thursday, 2 May 2019

algebra precalculus - Rewriting a sum



I'm stuck proving this result...




Let $a$ be a positive even integer and $m$ a positive integer.



Show that $$a^m\sum_{k=0}^{m}\frac{(-1)^k {2k \choose k}a^{-k}}{2^{2k}} $$ can be rewritten as $$\frac{2K+1}{2^b}$$ where $K\in \mathbb Z$ and $b$ satisifies $$b=m+e_b$$ where $e_b$ is the exponent of $2$ in $m!$



I really don't know how to begin... Thanks for your help.


Answer



We have
$$a^m\sum^m_{k=0}\frac{(-1)^k\binom{2k}{k}a^{-k}}{4^k}=\frac{x}{2^{m+e}}$$




where $x$ is odd
$$\sum^m_{k=0}\binom{2k}{k}(-4)^{-k}a^{m-k}=\frac{x}{2^{m+e}}=\frac{x2^{m-e}}{4^m}$$
If $m$ is even, then the parity of $-k$ is the same as $m-k$ and we can safely manipulate
$$\sum^m_{k=0}\binom{2k}{k}(-4a)^{m-k}=x2^{m-e}\tag{1}$$
If not, the sign of the whole sum gets inverted, but this does not change the parity of it.By the same token as robjohn's answer, we have that
$$\text{number of factors 2 in n!}=\nu_2(n) =\sum_{i=0}^kn_i\left(1+2+2^2+\dots+2^{i-1}\right)$$
Where $n_i$ are the i th coefficients of the binary representation of $n$.
Since the binary representation of $2n$ is just the one of $n$ shifted one number to the left, we then have that
$$
\begin{align}

\nu_2(2n)
&=\sum_{i=0}^kn_i\left(1+2+2^2+\dots+2^{i-1}+2^i\right)\\
&=\nu_2(n)+\sum_{i=0}^kn_i2^i=\nu_2(n)+n
\end{align}$$
Then, the number of factors $2$ in the last term of $(1)$ is
$$\nu_2(m)+m-2\nu_2(m)=m-v_2(m)=m-e$$



So now we just have to show that the other terms are an even multiple of $2^{m-e}$.



We then have that the exponent of two of the penultimate term is

$$[m-1-\nu_2(m-1)]+2=m+1-\nu_2(m-1)$$
Since $\nu_2(m-1)\le\nu_2(m)$, we have
$$m-\nu_2(m)\le m-\nu_2(m-1)Therefore the exponent of two in the last term is strictly smaller than the previous one,i.e. all the other terms are an even multiple of it. Finally, we know that $2^{m-e}$ is the highest power of $2$ that divides our expression.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find $lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}$

How to find $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h}$ without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...