Notation: For φ∈[0,π2] and k∈[0,1) the definitions
F(φ,k)=φ∫0dθ√1−k2sin2(θ)=sin(φ)∫0dx√(1−k2x2)(1−x2)
and K(k)=F(π2,k) will be used for the elliptic integrals of the first kind.
When answering this question, I came across the function
ψ:[0,1)→(0,∞),ψ(k)=1∫0K(kx)√(1−k2x2)(1−x2)dx=π/2∫0K(ksin(θ))√1−k2sin2(θ)dθ.
While ψ(k)=π24[1+38k2+O(k4)] near k=0 is readily found using Maclaurin series, the expansion at k=1 is more elusive.
The naive attempt of replacing K(kx) by K(k) (since the largest contribution to the integral comes from the region near x=1) yields ψ(k)≃K2(k), which according to plots is not too far off but also not quite right. Integration by parts reproduces this term, but the remaining integral does not look very nice:
ψ(k)=K2(k)−k1∫0K′(kx)F(arcsin(x),k)dx=K2(k)−1∫0[E(kx)1−k2x2−K(kx)]F(arcsin(x),k)xdx.
The expansion K(k)=−12log(1−k8)+o(1) is useful for the final steps, but I do not know how to extract all the leading terms, so:
How can we find the asymptotic expansion (ideally up to and including the constant terms) of ψ(k) as k↗1 ?
Answer
Some heuristics:
From DMLF we get the asymptotic Expansion of K(z) up toll all orders around z=1−
K(z)∼−12log(1−z2)+2log(2)+O((1−z2)log(1−z2))
disregarding the terms which vanish at z=1− we obtain (Unluckily i don't see a way of making a precise estimate of the O-term, but it should definitly be o(1))
ψ(k)∼−∫1012log(1−k2x2)√1−x2√1−(kx)2dx−2log(2)∫101√1−x2√1−(kx)2
or (a proof for the first integral can be found here in section 7., the second is just the very defintion of K(k))
ψ(k)∼−12K(k)log(1−k2)−2log(2)K(k)
which fits Pretty well (the relative error for k=0.999999999 is about 2.1% and for k=0.9999999 is about 2.5%, so we are most likely off by a constant)
Using the asympototic Expansion from the beginning of the post again we could further simplifiy the above, but i leave it like that...
No comments:
Post a Comment