Thursday, 6 December 2012

The Relationship Between Real and Complex Numbers

In mathematics involving waves, it is common to express cosine (or sine) with a different representation using the inverse Euler formula:



cos(θ)=eiθ+eiθ2



For example, the following expression can be rewritten using the inverse Euler formula:



cos(5πt)cos(6πt)=(ei5πt+ei5πt2)(ei6πt+ei6πt2)




And this makes the simplification/decomposition of this expression much simpler.



I was just wondering why Euler's formula can be used to seemingly convert a real number to a complex number. When I think of real numbers, I think of just a single number/scalar. I think of imaginary numbers, however, as a tuple of sorts, (a,b), where a is the real part and b is imaginary part (but both a and b are real numbers of course).



In other words, I see the left side of (1) as just a number and the right side as an ordered pair. How can a single number in any expression be replaced by this ordered pair and not "change the result"?



Of course, the imaginary part of the ordered pair in (1) is 0, and I have heard people say that real numbers can be treated as complex numbers with an imaginary part equal to 0. However, how does one go about proving this? How does one know that any operation performed on the real and complex number will have the same result? I feel comfortable proving this on a case-by-case basis, but is there a general way to show that this can always be done?

No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...