Tuesday, 13 September 2016

sequences and series - Induction proof of lower bound for sumsqrtn




I'm having some trouble proving the following statement using mathematical induction:



12n321+2+3+4+...+n, (for all sufficiently large n)



I'm sort of confused because n32 = nn12 which means that there are n of the largest possible root values on the left hand side while the right hand side has values like 1, 2, etc. As n grows sufficiently large wouldn't the left hand side outgrow the right hand side no matter what the constant multiple is? If I'm thinking about this correctly just let me know, if not, any help would be appreciated.


Answer



You’re right that nk=1knn=n3/2,

but you can’t infer from that that 12n3/2 will eventually exceed nk=1k. Suppose that we divide everything through by n. Then the claimed inequality becomes



12n1nnk=1k.




The righthand side of (1) is just the arithmetic mean of the square roots 1,2,n. You’ve observed (correctly) that this mean cannot be any bigger than n, the largest of the n numbers, but that doesn’t mean that it must eventually be smaller than half of the largest number. In fact, if you draw the graph of y=x you’ll see that it gets less and less steep as x increases. When n is large, therefore, most of the square roots in the list 1,2,,n are a lot closer to n than they are to 0, and when you average them, the result is closer to n than to 0. But that just means that it’s bigger than 12n.



To prove the theorm by induction, you have to establish a starting point (‘base case’) and prove an induction step. For the induction step, suppose that you know for some n that 12n3/2nk=1k;

this is your induction hypothesis. You want to use it to show that 12(n+1)3/2n+1k=1k.



To get from the righthand side of (2) to the righthand side of (3), we’ve obviously just added n+1. If we knew that the lefthand side increased by at most n+1, i.e., that



12(n+1)3/212n3/2+n+1,

we’d be in business: we’d have



12(n+1)3/212n3/2+n+1nk=1k+n+1=n+1k=1k,




showing that (2) does imply (3).



So how can we show that



12(n+1)3/212n3/2+n+1?



Let’s tinker a bit. (4) is equivalent to



(n+1)3/2n3/2+2n+1,




which is equivalent to



(n+1)n+1nn+2n+1.



This in turn is equivalent to



nn+1+n+1nn+2n+1,



which is equivalent to




nn+1nn+n+1

and then to (n1)n+1nn.



Everything in (5) is non-negative, so (5) is equivalent (for positive integers n) to the inequality that you get by squaring it,



(n1)2(n+1)n3.



Can you show that (6) is true for all positive integers? If so, working back through the chain of equivalent inequalities gives you (4) for all positive integers and thereby shows that (2) implies (3) for all positive integers. To finish the induction, you just have to find a positive integer n0 for which (2) is true to conclude that (2) is true for all integers nn0.



Added: This is the elementary way to approach the problem. If you’re a bit ingenious and know your calculus, you can prove the result without induction. The sum nk=1k is an upper Riemann sum for n0x dx, so n0x dxnk=1k. How does n0x dx compare with 12n3/2?


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...