Sunday, 26 February 2017

real analysis - Finding the derivative of f(x)=intinfty1fracexyy2dy,:::xin(0,infty)




Let

f(x)=1exyy2dy,x(0,)


Show that f(x) is differentiable on (0,), find the formula for f(x)? Is f(x) twice differentiable?




I'm thinking to define a sequence as follow
fn(x)=n1exyy2dy.



To show fn(x) is differentiable, I'm thinking to show the following limit exists,



limh0n1e(x+h)yexyy2h.




To be able to pass the limit inside the integral, we can apply the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem. So I want to see if I can apply it. Since e(x+h)yexyy2h is bounded by euyy, (where xux+h) which is integrable on [1,).



Hence fn(x)=n1ddx(exyy2)dy=n1exyydy.



Now, limnn1exyydy=1exyydy.



However I see a problem here, since in fact, we have
f(x)=limh0limnn1e(x+h)yexyy2h.




But I'm not sure, if I'm allowed to interchange these two limits. I appreciate any hint or alternative proof.


Answer



Let's take two derivatives under the integral first, and we will talk about justifying it after the fact.



Consider f(x)=1exyy2dy.



Then two derivatives with respect to x are easy to take here:



f(x)=1exydy=exyx|1=exx.







Note that the denominator gets completely cancelled by the chain rule. Hence, (provided we can justify the derivatives) we have f(x)=exxdx=exln(x)+x1ln(τ)eτdτ+C

for some CR.



Finally, we can see that as x that f(x)0. We conclude that f(x)=exln(x)+x1ln(τ)eτdτ.






To justify passing the derivative through the integral, we can appeal to the measure theory version of the Leibniz integral rule.




What we need is a function that bounds g(x,y)=ddxexyy2=exyy independent of x that is also integrable. For any δ>0, we have |g(x,y)|eδyy

for all x[δ,). Therefore, given x>δ, we have ddx1exyy2dy=1ddx(exyy2)dy.
Since, δ was chosen to be an arbitrary positive number, we may conclude that this formula holds for all x>0. A similar argument can be performed for the second derivative as well.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...