It isn't hard to algebraically show that:
(nk)=n+r−k∑j=r(j−1r−1)(n−jk−r),1≤r≤k I'm trying to find some sort of combinatorial "proof"/intuition as to why this is true. My thought is that it is similar to Pascal's Rule, but I'm not sure.
Thanks!
Answer
Clearly (nk) is the number of k-element subsets of [n]={1,…,n}. We can categorize these subsets according to their r-th smallest element. How many of them have r-th smallest element j? There are j−1 members of [n] less than j, and we have to choose r−1 of them for our set; this can be done in (j−1r−1) ways. There are n−j members of [n] bigger than j, and we have to choose k−r of them for our set; this can be done in (n−jk−r) ways. Thus, there are
(j−1r−1)(n−jk−r)
ways to choose a k-element subset of [n] whose r-th smallest element is j. Summing over the possible values of j yields the desired identity,
n+r−k∑j=r(j−1r−1)(n−jk−r)=(nk).
No comments:
Post a Comment