Monday, 19 May 2014

calculus - Integral with exp and erf




I found an integral calculated from what I understand with “differentation under the integration sign” method.



exp(b2(xc)2)erf(a(xd))dx=πberf(ab(cd)a2+b2)
for b>0.



The author of the original post explains how he obtained the solution:





“got it by differentiating the integrand w.r.t. a, then integrated over x=-inf..inf, then substituted a=sqrt(b*z)/sqrt(1-z) and integrated over z and then - most important - checked the result numerically.”




So I tried to follow that procedure and I get:
I(a)=exp(b2(xc)2)erf(a(xd))dx



dI(a)da=ddaexp(b2(xc)2)erf(a(xd))dx



dI(a)da=aexp(b2(xc)2)erf(a(xd))dx




dI(a)da=2exp(b2(c+x)2a2(d+x)2)(d+x)πdx



dI(a)da=2b2(cd)(a2+b2)3/2exp(a2b2(cd)2a2+b2)



Now I substitute z=a2a2+b2 and after some manipulations I get the right side of the last equation:
2b(cd)(1z)3/2exp(zb2(cd)2)



I’m not sure what my next step should be so I would appreciate any suggestions.



Answer



Let's try a close variant : differentiate relatively to d instead of a at the start (to avoid the additional factor (xd) in the integral and complications in the final integration) :



I(d)=eb2(xc)2 erf(a(xd))dx



dI(d)dd=2aπeb2(xc)2a2(xd)2dx



dI(d)dd=2aπeb2(xc)2a2(xd)2dx



dI(d)dd=2aπe(a2+b2)(xb2c+a2da2+b2)2+(b2c+a2d)2a2+b2(b2c2+a2d2)dx




dI(d)dd=2aπe(b2c+a2d)2a2+b2(b2c2+a2d2)e(a2+b2)y2dy



dI(d)dd=2aπea2b2(cd)2a2+b2πa2+b2=2aea2b2(cd)2a2+b2a2+b2



At this point we have to integrate again relatively to d to get (up to a function C independent of d) :



I(d)=πberf(ab(cd)a2+b2)+C(a,b,c)



(Alpha integration check : note that the denominator is b and not b nor my earlier ab as I checked numerically!)




After that you'll just have to prove that C(a,b,c)0



Note that the integration relatively to d seems more straightforward than relatively to a in your case (I'm not saying it can't be done your way!).



Hoping it clarified things a little even if it didn't answer your question,


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...