I am working through Axler's "Linear Algebra Done Right" and I am having trouble intuiting some of the meaning behind affine subsets. According to 2 exercises in the book we have that
(1) A subset A is affine if and only if for any v,w∈A and any scalar λ, λv+(1−λ)w∈A
(2) Given vectors v1,...,vn∈V the subset A of V given by A={∑λivi:λi∈F,∑λi=1} is affine
I more or less understand the definition of affine subsets (they're sort of like subspaces without the identity and they're either disjoint or equal, like equivalence classes) and I more or less understand the mechanics of the proofs of these problems, but I have no intuition for why these conditions imply affine-ness. What's so special about linear combinations the sum of the scalars of which is 1?
Answer
Remember that the straight line through points w and v is given by
{w+λ(v−w):λ∈R}
Now a bit of algebra shows that
w+λ(v−w)=w+λv−λw=λv+(1−λ)w
Or in short, the condition states that a subset is affine if and only if for any two points in that set, the straight line through those two points lies completely in that set.
For example, in three-dimensional space, the affine subsets are the full space (obviously), all planes, all straight lines, the single points (since for v=w we get λv+(1−λ)v=v) and the empty set.
No comments:
Post a Comment