Friday, 20 February 2015

convergence divergence - Infinite series of positive and negative terms both divergent



Let x be the infinite series



k=0f(k)



Let p be the sum of all positive terms and n the sum of all negative terms from x. My question is: if p and n are both divergent, does x have no absolute sum? Can it be rearranged to form any arbitrary resulting value? I believe it is true because if at least one of p and n was convergent, then x would have an absolutely determinable sum.


Answer



In a word, yes. In more detail, let (ak)k=0 be a real sequence, and put

a+k=max(ak,0)=12(|ak|+ak),ak=min(ak,0)=12(|ak|ak),


so that
|ak|=a+k+ak,ak=a+kak.

The following are equivalent:





  1. k=0|ak| converges (i.e., (ak)k=0 is absolutely summable);


  2. Each of k=0a±k converges (absolutely).




Further,




  1. If k=0ak converges conditionally (i.e., (ak)k=0 is summable, but not absolutely), then each of k=0a±k diverges.




Proofs:



1. implies 2.: Comparison, plus a±k=|a±k||ak|.



2. implies 1.: |ak|=a+k+ak.



3. If both (ak) and (ak) are summable, then so is (a+k), since a+k=ak+ak, so (ak) is absolutely summable since |ak|=a+k+ak. Contrapositively, if (ak) is summable but not absolutely summable, then (ak) is not summable.




An entirely similar argument shows that if (ak) is conditionally summable, then (a+k) is not summable.



As you say, if (ak) is conditionally summable, the series can be rearranged to converge to an arbitrary sum (or so that the partial sums diverge "in a more-or-less arbitrary way").


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...