Thursday, 19 February 2015

linear algebra - Intuition/Understanding of Inverse and Determinants



This is not homework, but extends from a proof in my book.




EDIT
We're given an m×m nonsingular matrix B.



According to the definition of an inverse, we can calculate each element of a matrix B1, for a given matrix B, such that each element is equal to an (m1)×(m1) determinant divided by an m×m nonzero determinant.



Could someone please elaborate on this? I'm not sure why I don't see this, so I may need a lot of explanation.


Answer



Perhaps one way to understand -- Look up Cramer's Rule, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer%27s_rule and think about what the rule means when you want to find x that solves Ax=ei where ei is a basis vector (all 0, except 1 at position i in the vector). If you understand why Cramer's Rule is true, then you're basically there -- just note that if you want to solve the equations Ax=ei for all basis vectors (i.e. giving the identity matrix when you put the basis vectors and solutions into one matrix equation, giving AX=I) then you will get the determinant and sub-determinant based formula for matrix inverse X=A1 you described.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...