Wednesday, 8 April 2015

abstract algebra - If a matrix has a unique left inverse then does it necessarily have a unique right inverse (which is the same inverse)?




I know if a matrix has a left and right inverse then the inverses are the same and are (is) unique and the original matrix is a square matrix, thus if I have a matrix which has multiple left inverses for example then it has no right inverse and is a non-square matrix. But if a matrix has a unique left inverse then does it necessarily have a unique right inverse? So basically does it have to be a square matrix to have unique inverse from one side? (I'm guessing yes since an underdetermined linear equation system has either no or infinite solutions but I need confirmation.) Thank You all in advance!


Answer



It has to be a square matrix. This can be shown by using basic properties about linear equation systems:



Let A be a m×n-matrix. An n×m-matrix B is a left inverse of A if and only if
mk=1BikAkj=(BA)ij=Iij=δijfor every 1i,jn.
This results in a linear equation system in the variables Bij. It has mn variables and n2 equations, so for the uniqueness of the solution we must have n2nm and thus nm.



On the other hand we have BAx=x for every xKn, so the linear equation system By=x has a solution for every xKn. By looking at the echelon form of B we see that this can only happen if nm (if n>m then the echelon form of B contains zero rows). So we must have n=m, so A and B are both square matrices.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...