In calculus we learn about the substitution method of integrals, but I haven't been able to prove that it works. I mainly don't see how manipulations of differentials is justified, i.e how dy/dx=f(x) means that dy=dx∗f(x) so dx∗f(x) can be substituted for dy, since I thought that dy/dx is merely notation and that dy and dx don't actually exist.
Answer
Essentially we want to show:
∫baf(y)dy=∫g−1(b)g−1(a)f(g(x))g′(x)dx
for a strictly increasing continuous function g (if g is decreasing, we take −g and absorb the minus sign into swapping the limits). If {y0,…,yn} is a partition of [a,b], yj−1≤y∗j≤yj, then a Riemann sum for the left integral is
n∑j=1f(y∗j)(yj−yj−1).
Put yj:=g(xj). So {x0,…,xn} is a partition of [g−1(a),g−1(b)]. By the mean value theorem, there exists x∗j∈[xj−1,xj] such that
g′(x0j)=g(xj)−g(xj−1)xj−xj−1⟺yj−yj−1=g′(x∗j)(xj−xj−1).
Now remember that all Riemann sums converge to the integral (by definition of a function being Riemann integrable), so we may choose y∗j so that x∗j=g−1(y∗j). Hence we have
n∑j=1f(y∗j)(yj−yj−1)=n∑j=1f(g(x∗j)g′(x∗j)(xj−xj−1).
Now we simply recognise that the right hand side is a Riemann sum for the right integral and that max|yj−yj−1|→0 as max|xj−xj−1|→0.
Sorry for such a lengthy answer - the basic takeaway is that you can prove it, and the notation we use is just a shorthand. While dy and dx are not actual objects as you rightly point out, they act similarly enough in a lot of ways that we often treat them as such.
No comments:
Post a Comment