Sunday, 26 July 2015

sequences and series - How to solve this multiple summation?



How to solve this summation ?



0x1x2...xnn(k+x11x1)(k+x21x2)...(k+xn1xn)
where k , n are known.



Due to hockey-stick identity ,

ni=0(i+k1i)=(n+kk)


Answer



Suppose we seek to evaluate
0x1x2xnn(k+x11x1)(k+x21x2)(k+xn1xn).



Using the Polya Enumeration Theorem and the cycle index of the

symmetric group this becomes
Z(Sn)(Q0+Q1+Q2++Qn)



evaluated at
Qm=(k1+mm).



Now the OGF of the cycle index Z(Sn) of the symmetric group is
G(z)=exp(a1z1+a2z22+a3z33+).



The substituted generating function becomes
H(z)=exp(p1zppnm=0(k1+mm)p)=exp(nm=0p1zpp(k1+mm)p)=exp(nm=0log11(k1+mm)z)=nm=011(k1+mm)z.



Some thought shows that this could have been obtained by inspection.


We use partial fractions by residues on this function which we
re-write as follows:
(1)n+1nm=0(k1+mm)1nm=01z1/(k1+mm).



Switching to residues we obtain
(1)n+1nm=0(k1+mm)1nm=01z1/(k1+mm)×np=0,pm11/(k1+mm)1/(k1+pp).



Preparing to extract coefficients we get
(1)nnm=0(k1+mm)1nm=0(k1+mm)1z(k1+mm)×np=0,pm11/(k1+mm)1/(k1+pp).




Doing the coefficient extraction we obtain
(1)nnm=0(k1+mm)1nm=0(k1+mm)n+1×np=0,pm11/(k1+mm)1/(k1+pp)=(1)nnm=0(k1+mm)1nm=0(k1+mm)2n+1×np=0,pm11(k1+mm)/(k1+pp)=(1)nnm=0(k1+mm)2nnp=0,pm1(k1+pp)(k1+mm).



The complexity here is good since the formula has a quadratic number
of terms in n. The number of partitions that a total enumeration

would have to consider is given by



Z(Sn)(Q0+Q1+Q2++Qn)



evaluated at Q0=Q1=Q2==Qn=1 which gives the
substituted generating function



A(z)=exp((n+1)log11z)=1(1z)n+1.




This yields for the total number of partitions
(n+nn)=(2nn)
which by Stirling has asymptotic
(consult OEIS A00984)
4nπnandn2o(4nπn).



For example when n=24 and k=5 we would have to consider
(4824)=32.247.603.683.100 partitions but the formula

readily yields
42428385183941043810926169770907743004588251484466532768406217230660254960158131603789563454425647212676100.



Additional exploration of these formulae may be undertaken using the
following Maple code which contrasts total enumeration and the closed
formula.





A :=
proc(n, k)
option remember;
local iter;

iter :=
proc(l)
if nops(l) = 0 then
add(iter([q]), q=0..n)
elif nops(l) < n then

add(iter([op(l), q]), q=op(-1, l)..n)
else
mul(binomial(k-1+l[q], l[q]), q=1..n);
fi;
end;

iter([]);
end;

EX :=

proc(n, k)
option remember;

(-1)^n*add(binomial(k-1+m,m)^(2*n)*
mul(1/(binomial(k-1+p,p)-binomial(k-1+m,m)), p=0..m-1)*
mul(1/(binomial(k-1+p,p)-binomial(k-1+m,m)), p=m+1..n),
m=0..n);
end;

No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...