(Sorry if the title isn't clear. I couldn't think of a good title for this question.)
Edit: @mathlove pointed out some mistakes in my original question. We can easily see anything that are in the criterion of Fermat's last theorem can be disproved (for m=n$\geq$3.) what about for those which doesn't satisfy the criteria in Fermat? e.g. $a^{128}+b^2$?
This is a question concerning the properties of exponentiation. Say a certain constant, $C$ is a part of a diophantine equation, e.g. $a^2+b^2=C$ that (we are sure) has integer roots $a$, $b$. We then take the constant $C$ to the exponent of itself, $C^C$. Will the new value, $C^C$ have the an integer solution to the same equation? (while the actual integer root values might change, I'm simply concerned with thether I can have an integer solution).
The question can be shortened into this form: given $C$ and a random diophantine equation of two variables, which, on the right hand side has $C$ as a constant and on the left hand side the general form of $a^n+b^m$. Assume we know there exists integer solutions $a$, $b$ to the diophantine equation, can we conclude that an integer solution also exists for the same diophantine equation with $C$ replaced as $C^C$?
Answer
The short answer is no (see the comments above). Here are some counterexamples collected from the comments thread (with thanks to @mathlove for pointing them out):
$𝑎^4+𝑏^4=2$ holds for $𝑎=𝑏=1$, but there are no integers $𝑎,𝑏$ such that $𝑎^4+𝑏^4=22$.
$𝑎^{128}+𝑏^2=5$ holds for $𝑎=1,𝑏=2$, but there are no integers $𝑎,𝑏$ such that $𝑎^{128}+𝑏^2=55$.
No comments:
Post a Comment