Thursday, 24 December 2015

radicals - Follow-up Question: Proof of Irrationality of sqrt3



As a follow-up to this question, I noticed that the proof used the fact that p and q were "even". Clearly, when replacing factors of 2 with factors of 3 everything does not simply come down to being "even" or "odd", so how could I go about proving that 3 is irrational?


Answer



It's very simple, actually.
Assume that 3 = pq, with p,q coprime integers.




Then, p=3q and p2=3q2. If 3p2, then 3p. So actually, 9p2. Then, by similar logic, 3q2, meaning 3q. Since 3 divides both p and q, the two numbers are not coprime. This is a contradiction, since we assumed that they were coprime. Therefore, 3 cannot be written as a ratio of coprime integers and must be irrational.






NOTE: The word "even" in the original proof was just a substitution for "divisible by 2". This same idea of divisibility was used in this proof to show that p and q were divisible by 3. It really is the same idea. There just isn't a nice concise word like "even" that was used to describe a multiple of 3 in this proof.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...