Thursday, 2 February 2017

integration - Bizarre Definite Integral




Does the following equality hold?



10tan1(8821215+36x2)1x2dx=π26



The supposed equality holds to 61 decimal places in Mathematica, which fails to numerically evaluate it after anything greater than 71 digits of working precision. I am unsure of it's correctness, and I struggle to prove it's correctness.



The only progress I have in solving this is the following identity, which holds for all real x:



tan1(11+6x421)+tan1(116x421)tan1(8821215+36x2)




I also tried the Euler Substitution t2=1x1+x but it looks horrible.



Addition: Is there some kind of general form to this integral?



Side thoughts: Perhaps this is transformable into the Generalised Ahmed's Integral, or something similar.


Answer



As pointed out in one of the comments, user @Start wearing purple demonstrated a very general approach for solving this kind of integral, see this. As an alternative approach, let me give a different argument that appeals to a specific property satisfied by OP's integral.



Step 1. (Reduction and the main claim) We begin by substituting x=cos(θ/2). Then the integral equals




12π0arctan(8821233+18cosθ)dθ=π412π0arctan(233+18cosθ8821)dθ.



So it suffices to prove that



π0arctan(233+18cosθ8821)dθ?=π26.



To evaluate this integral, let me give the punchline.




Claim. Let 0<a<1 and b>0 satisfy 4a2b2=43. Then

π0arctan(a+bcosθ)dθ=π26.




Notice that (a,b)=(2338821,188821) satisfies the relation in the assertion of Claim. So we focus on proving this claim.



Step 2. (Definition and properties of I)
Now define I(a,b) by



I(a,b)=π0arctan(a+bcosθ)dθ.




From the substitution θπθ, it is clear that I(a,b)=I(a,b). Then for 0<a<1 and 0<θ<π, we have



arctan(a+bcosθ)+arctan(abcosθ)=arctan(2a1(a2b2cos2θ))=arctan(4a22a2+b2+b2cos(2θ))=π2arctan(22a2+b24a+b24acos(2θ)).
Plugging this back and exploiting the symmetry of cosine, we have




I(a,b)=π2412I(22a2+b24a,b24a).



Step 3. Now here comes the central observation. Let (a,b) satisfy 0<a<1 and b>0, and define the sequence (an,bn) recursively by



(a0,b0)=(a,b),(an+1,bn+1)=(22a2n+b2n4an,b2n4an).




Observation. Assume that 4a2b2=43. Then for all n0 we have
13an+1an,4a2nb2n=43.





The proof is a tedious algebra, so we skip this. Now by this observation, we have |an|<1 for all n. Then a recursive application of (2) gives



I(a,b)=π24n1k=0(12)k+(12)nI(an,bn).



Since |I(an,bn)|π22 for all n, taking limist as n proves the claim.






Remark. (1) The condition 4a2b2=43 is crucial for our proof. For arbitrary starting point (a,b), the sequence (an,bn) is dynamically unstable and hence the formula (2) is not applicable.




(2) The claim is true for any a>0 in view of the principle of analytic continuation.



(3) Again, @Start wearing purple's computation gives a more general result with a relatively economic computation: for all a,bR,



π0arctan(a+bcosθ)dθ=πarg(1+ia+b2+(1+ia)2).



This follows from the formula



π0log(1+scosθ)dθ=πlog(1+1s22)




which is valid for any complex s with |s|<1. Our relation 4a2b2=43 ensures that the RHS of (3) is always π26, since 1+ia+b2+(1+ia)2=(1+3a)(1+i3).


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...