Does the following equality hold?
∫10tan−1(88√21215+36x2)√1−x2dx=π26
The supposed equality holds to 61 decimal places in Mathematica, which fails to numerically evaluate it after anything greater than 71 digits of working precision. I am unsure of it's correctness, and I struggle to prove it's correctness.
The only progress I have in solving this is the following identity, which holds for all real x:
tan−1(11+6x4√21)+tan−1(11−6x4√21)≡tan−1(88√21215+36x2)
I also tried the Euler Substitution t2=1−x1+x but it looks horrible.
Addition: Is there some kind of general form to this integral?
Side thoughts: Perhaps this is transformable into the Generalised Ahmed's Integral, or something similar.
Answer
As pointed out in one of the comments, user @Start wearing purple demonstrated a very general approach for solving this kind of integral, see this. As an alternative approach, let me give a different argument that appeals to a specific property satisfied by OP's integral.
Step 1. (Reduction and the main claim) We begin by substituting x=cos(θ/2). Then the integral equals
12∫π0arctan(88√21233+18cosθ)dθ=π4−12∫π0arctan(233+18cosθ88√21)dθ.
So it suffices to prove that
∫π0arctan(233+18cosθ88√21)dθ?=π26.
To evaluate this integral, let me give the punchline.
Claim. Let 0<a<1 and b>0 satisfy 4a2−b2=43. Then
∫π0arctan(a+bcosθ)dθ=π26.
Notice that (a,b)=(23388√21,1888√21) satisfies the relation in the assertion of Claim. So we focus on proving this claim.
Step 2. (Definition and properties of I)
Now define I(a,b) by
I(a,b)=∫π0arctan(a+bcosθ)dθ.
From the substitution θ↦π−θ, it is clear that I(a,−b)=I(a,b). Then for 0<a<1 and 0<θ<π, we have
arctan(a+bcosθ)+arctan(a−bcosθ)=arctan(2a1−(a2−b2cos2θ))=arctan(4a2−2a2+b2+b2cos(2θ))=π2−arctan(2−2a2+b24a+b24acos(2θ)).
Plugging this back and exploiting the symmetry of cosine, we have
I(a,b)=π24−12I(2−2a2+b24a,b24a).
Step 3. Now here comes the central observation. Let (a,b) satisfy 0<a<1 and b>0, and define the sequence (an,bn) recursively by
(a0,b0)=(a,b),(an+1,bn+1)=(2−2a2n+b2n4an,b2n4an).
Observation. Assume that 4a2−b2=43. Then for all n≥0 we have
1√3≤an+1≤an,4a2n−b2n=43.
The proof is a tedious algebra, so we skip this. Now by this observation, we have |an|<1 for all n. Then a recursive application of (2) gives
I(a,b)=π24n−1∑k=0(−12)k+(−12)nI(an,bn).
Since |I(an,bn)|≤π22 for all n, taking limist as n→∞ proves the claim.
Remark. (1) The condition 4a2−b2=43 is crucial for our proof. For arbitrary starting point (a,b), the sequence (an,bn) is dynamically unstable and hence the formula (2) is not applicable.
(2) The claim is true for any a>0 in view of the principle of analytic continuation.
(3) Again, @Start wearing purple's computation gives a more general result with a relatively economic computation: for all a,b∈R,
∫π0arctan(a+bcosθ)dθ=πarg(1+ia+√b2+(1+ia)2).
This follows from the formula
∫π0log(1+scosθ)dθ=πlog(1+√1−s22)
which is valid for any complex s with |s|<1. Our relation 4a2−b2=43 ensures that the RHS of (3) is always π26, since 1+ia+√b2+(1+ia)2=(1+√3a)(1+i√3).
No comments:
Post a Comment