This is a follow up to my previous question, were I asked for a proof, that for any nonnempty set of integers A, not all zero, the greastet common divisor of A exists.
If A is finite, with A={a1,…,ak} and k=#A, then we can easily show, that there are x1,…,xk∈Z with gcd, and we can construct these integers. We use the extended euclidian algorithm and, if k\geq 2, the fact, that \gcd(a_1, \dots, a_k) = \gcd(a_1, \gcd(a_2, \dots, a_k).
Now suppose A is infinite:
- How can we show, that there is a k\in \mathbb{N}, a_1,\dots, a_k \in A and x_1,\dots, x_k\in \mathbb{Z}, with \gcd(A) = \sum_{i=1}^k x_ia_i?
Alternatively:
How can we prove the existence of some finite set A', with A'\subseteq A and \gcd(A')=\gcd(A)? - In what cases (for what sets) can we actually compute integers k and a_1, \dots, a_k with said property? (I'm looking for relatively general examples; not the exact class of sets, that satisfy this property)
- When and how can we determine the least possible k? When and how can we determine the set of sets A' with A'\subseteq A and \gcd(A')=\gcd(A), such that \#A' is minimal?
Answer
Assume that \gcd(A)=1 (if not, just divide by the common factor). Let a_0\in A. If a_0=1, then we're done. Else, say a_0=p_1^{e_1}\cdots p_n^{e_n}. Since A has gcd 1, there exist a_i\in A such that p_i\nmid a_i. Then \gcd(a_0, a_1,\ldots, a_n)=1.
To optimize this, select a_0 to have the least number of prime factors, choose a_i to minimize the number of prime factors of \gcd (a_0, a_1, \ldots, a_i).
No comments:
Post a Comment