I have been told that if a series satisfies the Cauchy criterion, it converges. I was not quite convinced on this, however, since some of the posts on this website seemed to imply otherwise. I came up with what I thought was a counterexample: I argued that 1/n satisfies the Cauchy criterion but diverges. However, I've been told afterwards that 1/n doesn't satisfy the Cauchy criterion. Now, I've tried to show that the 1/n does not satisfy the Cauchy criterion but couldn't come up with a proof. Can someone provide me a proof that shows that the series 1/n does not satisfy the Cauchy criterion?
Answer
The sequence {1/n:n=1,2,3,…} satisfies the Cauchy criterion and converges.
The series ∞∑n=11n diverges. That is the same as saying that its sequence of partial sums
{m∑n=11n:m=1,2,3,…}
diverges. The latter sequence is not a Cauchy sequence. To see that it's not a Cauchy sequence without first considering whether it converges, consider the difference between the m1th term and the m2th term, whree m2>m1:
=|m1∑n=11n−m2∑n=11n|=|m2∑n=m1+11n|≥|∫m2m1+11xdx|=|logm2m1+1|→∞ as m2→∞.
Don't confuse sequences with series.
No comments:
Post a Comment