Let q be a prime power and Fq a finite field with q elements.
Moreover let Fqm be an extension field. For every α∈Fqm define
the polynomial
gα(x)=xq−x−α∈Fqm[x].
My questions:
For which α (and m) the polynomial
gα(x) has at least one root in Fqm?Which is the splitting field of gα?
Here my thoughts.
If β is a root of gα, then the set of roots of gα is
β+Fq:={β+λ|λ∈Fq}.
This means that if gα has one root in Fqm then all the roots belongs to Fqm.If α≠0 then β∉Fq.
Any help or reference will be appreciated.
Thanks.
Alessandro
EDIT
It seems by computation with Macaulay2, for every α∈Fqm there are only 2 possibilities for the polynomial gα.
gα splits into linear factors.
There exist λ∈Fq, γ1,…,γqmp∈Fqm (where p is the characteritic of the field), s.t.
gα(x)=qmp∏i=1(xp−λx−γi).
But I don't know how to prove it.
Answer
Partial answer and/or something that is too long to fit into a comment.
Consider the relative trace function
trm1:Fqm→Fq,x↦x+xq+xq2+⋯+xqm−1.
We easily see (or know) that trm1 is Fq-linear, and surjective. Furthermore,
trm1(zq)=trm1(z)
for all z∈Fqm. Therefore, again for all z∈Fqm, we have trm1(zq−z)=0. The mapping
P:Fqm→Fqm,x↦xq−x
is also Fq-linear. Clearly ker(P)=Fq, so rank-nullity theorem implies that im(P) has dimension m−1. But we just saw that im(P)⊆ker(trm1). Therefore we get equality
im(P)=ker(trm1).
Together with your observation this implies that
gα(x) has a zero in the field Fqm if and only if trm1(α)=0.
As you observed, when this holds all the q zeros of gα(x) will be in the field Fqm.
The factorization you observed can be described as follows.
Assume that trm1(α)≠0. Let z be a zero of gα(x) in some extension field of Fqm. Let's consider the Galois conjugates of z over Fqm. These are gotten by iterating the Frobenius automorphism F:z↦zqm. But we know that F(α)=α and that
F(z)=zqm=zqm−gα(z)=z+α.
An easy induction then proves that for all i=1,2,…,p we have
Fi(z)=z+i⋅α.
In particular the lowest power of F that maps z to itself is Fp. Therefore the minimal polynomial of z over Fqm is
mz(x):=p−1∏i=0(x−z−iα).
Let's denote T(x)=xp−x=∏p−1i=0(x−i)∈Fp[x]. We see that
T(x−zα)=p−1∏i=0(x−zα−i)=α−pmz(x).
But T is additive, i.e. T(x+y)=T(x)+T(y) for all x,y∈¯Fq, so
mz(x)=αpT(x−zα)=αpT(x/α)−αpT(z/α)=xp−αp−1x−αpT(z/α).
In particular T(z/α) must be an element of Fqm. These are the factors that you see in your Macaulay output. In particular your λ=αp−1.
No comments:
Post a Comment