Saturday, 30 November 2019

complex analysis - Refining my knowledge of the imaginary number

So I am about halfway through complex analysis (using Churchill amd Brown's book) right now. I began thinking some more about the nature and behavior of i and ran into some confusion. I have seen the definition of i in two different forms; i=1 and i2=1. Now I know that these two statements are not equivalent, so I am confused as to which is the 'correct' definition. I see quite frequently that the first form is a common mistake, but then again Wolfram Math World says otherwise. So my questions are:




  1. What is the 'correct' definition of i and why? Or are both definitions correct and you can view the first one as a principal branch?


  2. It seems that if we are treating i as the number with the property i2=1, it is implied that we are treating i as a concept and not necessarily as a "quantity"?


  3. If we are indeed treating i as a concept rather than a "quantity", how would things such as ii and other equations/expressions involving i be viewed? How would such an equation have value if we treat i like a concept?





I've checked around on the various imaginary number posts on this site, so please don't mark this as a duplicate. My questions are different than those that have already been asked.

No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...