I solved the problem by way of contradiction. Suppose x=√2+3√2 is rational. Then we have
2=(x−√2)3=x3−3√2x2+6x−2√2=(x3+6x)−√2(3x2−2)
I've already shown that √2 is irrational, and it's easy to show a rational number plus an irrational number is irrational and that the product of an irrational and a rational is irrational. Given those facts, we have (x3+6x)∈Q and √2(3x2−2)∉Q, so
2=a∈Q+b∉Q⟹2∉Q a contradiction.
However, the book does it differently: it says
Show that x satisfies an equation of the type x6+a1x5+…+a6=0 where a1,…,a6 are integers; prove that x
is then either irrational or an integer.
- Is my way correct as well?
- I don't understand how the book does it. How does one obtain that equation, and once obtained, how does it prove x is irrational?
Answer
You've done half the job for their way: from
2=(x−√2)3=x3−3√2x2+6x−2√2=(x3+6x)−√2(3x2−2)
you deduce:(x3+6x−2)2=2(3x2+2)2,
whence x6−6x4−4x3+12x2−24x−4=0.
By the Rational roots theorem, we know that a rational root has to be an integer, and a divisor of 4, i. e. it can be only ±1,±2,±4. Just test them to check none is a root.
No comments:
Post a Comment