Monday, 22 December 2014

exponentiation - Why is (1)x=eipix



I was recently taught exponentials and I decided to play around with negative bases, which they told me were not allowed. The obvious place to start was negative one, and, as expected, the graphing tool did not work. However, after trying Wolfram, it told me it was equaled eiπx. I would understand why it oscillates, like the sine and cosine waves (negative base to an even power becomes positive, negative to an odd power is negative) but why are they exactly the same?


Answer



Because one logarithm of 1 is indeed iπ, as in eiπ+1=0.



Another logarithm is 3iπ, so a less common assignment for (1)x would be e3iπx




One application that is not widely known is with the Gelfond-Schneider Theorem, using your expression. Since 1 is not 0 or 1 and is algebraic (indeed rational and an integer), if x is irrational and algebraic over Q,
then eiπx=cosπx+isinπx
is transcendental. In turn, that means the real numbers cosπx and sinπx are transcendental.



I used that in an article.



Really.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...