Tuesday, 1 December 2015

real analysis - How do I prove that f(x)f(y)=f(x+y) implies that f(x)=ecx, assuming f is continuous and not zero?



This is part of a homework assignment for a real analysis course taught out of "Baby Rudin." Just looking for a push in the right direction, not a full-blown solution. We are to suppose that f(x)f(y)=f(x+y) for all real x and y, and that f is continuous and not zero. The first part of this question let me assume differentiability as well, and I was able to compose it with the natural log and take the derivative to prove that f(x)=ecx where c is a real constant. I'm having a little more trouble only assuming continuity; I'm currently trying to prove that f is differentiable at zero, and hence all real numbers. Is this an approach worth taking?


Answer



First note that f(x)>0, for all xR. This can be seen from the fact that
f(x)=f(x2+x2)=f(x2)2 Further, you can eliminate the case f(x)=0, since this would mean f0.



One way to go about is as follows.




1. Prove that f(m)=f(1)m for mZ+.



2. Now prove that f(m)=f(1)m for mZ.



3. Now prove that f(p/q)=f(1)p/q for pZ and qZ{0}.



4. Now make use of the fact that rationals are dense in R and hence you can find a sequence of rationals rnR such that rnrRQ. Now use continuity to conclude that f(x)=f(1)x for all xR. You will see that you need only continuity at one point to conclude that f(x)=f(1)x.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...