Thursday, 17 March 2016

real analysis - Show that f is continuous at exactly one point




Let f:RR be defined by



f(x)={5x+7 if x is rational x+11 if x is irrational 



Show that f is continuous at exactly one point.




My attempt:
Let aR, and take a rational sequence (xn) and an irrational sequence (yn) such that xna and yna.
Then f(xn)=5xn+75a+7 and f(yn)=yn+11a+11.
We have limnf(xn)=limnf(yn)=f(a)a=1.
Therefore f is continuous only at x=1.



Is the above valid? In the above, I have shown that for every sequence (zn) such that (zn)1, limnf(zn)=f(1). Doesn't that prove that f is continuous at x=1? In the given solutions they also used the ϵδ definition of continuity to prove that f is continuous at x=1, I'm not sure if that is necessary, or why it is necessary. Can anyone explain?




Thanks.


Answer



Using the sequential criterion for continuity is fine, but I think you have to make clear, why (f(zn)) converges for all zn1, even when not all zn are rational or all irrational. That almost follows from your argument (just look at the subseqeunces of the rational resp. irrational zn), but you can expand on this a little:




Let zn1 be any sequence. If all but finitely many zn are rational, then f(zn)f(1), as allready shown (the finitely many terms do not make a difference), same if all but finitely many zn are irrational. Otherwise (that is we have infinitely many rational and irrational zn) let (znk) denote the subsequence of rational and (znk) the subsequence of irrational numbers. Then (znk) and (znk) cover (zn) and have the same limit f(1) (as shown), hence f(zn)f(1).



No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...