When working over Z, it is well known what the structure of the multiplicative group (Z/nZ)× exactly is:
If n=p for a prime p, then (Z/pZ)× is the p−1 cyclic group Cp−1.
If n=pe for an odd prime p, then (Z/peZ)× is again a cyclic group Cϕ(pe)=Cpe−pe−1.
If n=2e for e≥2, then (Z/2eZ)× is no longer a cyclic group, but a product of two cyclic groups. It is of the form C2×C2e−2.
For a more general integer n, we can simply use the Chinese remainder theorem to obtain the precise structure of (Z/nZ)× using the above results.
My question is:
Is there a similar result for the multiplicative group of a quotient ring of Fp[X] where Fp is the finite field of p elements (where p is a prime power)? That is, what is the structure of
$$(\mathbb{F}_{p}[X]/\left)^{\times}$$
for a polynomial f(X)∈Fp[X]?
If f(X) is irreducible, then this group is again cyclic (since we know that the multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic). But what about the more general case? Again, we can use Chinese remainder theorem to reduce the general question to the case of f(X) being a power of an irreducible. So what do we know about the structure of
$$(\mathbb{F}_{p}[X]/\left
for an irreducible f(X)∈Fp[X] and e≥2?
Answer
what do we know about the structure of
(Fp[X]/⟨f(X)e⟩)×
for an irreducible f(X)∈Fp[X] and e≥2?
Assuming that deg(f)=n,
I claim that
(Fp[X]/⟨f(X)e⟩)×
is isomorphic to
Zpn−1×(Zn(e−2⌈ep⌉+⌈ep2⌉)p×Zn(⌈ep⌉−2⌈ep2⌉+⌈ep3⌉)p2×Zn(⌈ep2⌉−2⌈ep3⌉+⌈ep4⌉)p3×⋯).
The product looks infinite, but the exponents on the
factors eventually become zero.
For example, the group
(F3[x]/⟨(x2+1)13⟩)× is
isomorphic to Z8×(Z103×Z49×Z227).
Let R=(Fp[X]/⟨f(X)e⟩) and
J=⟨f(X)⟩.
Reduction modulo J yields a homomorphism of R×
onto (R/J)× with kernel 1+J.
The image (R/J)× is isomorphic to
F×pn≅Zpn−1,
which has order that is relatively prime to the order
of the kernel |1+J|=|J|=pn(e−1).
Thus
R×≅(R/J)××(1+J)≅Zpn−1×(1+J).
It remains to determine the structure of the p-group
(1+J).
The structure of a finite abelian p-group A is determined
by the orders of the annihilators
A[pk]:={a∈A|pka=0}.
These orders are not so hard to determine
when A=1+J.
That is, for α∈J, the element
1+α∈1+J is annihilated by pk exactly
when 1=(1+α)pk=1+αpk, which happens
exactly when fe divides αpk, which
happens exactly when α∈⟨f⌈epk⌉⟩.
Thus
|A[pk]|=|⟨f⌈epk⌉⟩|=pn(e−⌈epk⌉).
What remains is to determine the mi's in the expression
B=Zm1p×Zm2p×Zm3p×⋯
if this general abelian p-group has the same size annihilators as A=1+J;
i.e., if |B[pk]|=|A[pk]| for all k.
One computes that
|B[p]|=pm1+m2+m3+m4+⋯|B[p2]|=pm1+2m2+2m3+2m4+⋯|B[p3]|=pm1+2m2+3m3+3m4+⋯ETC.
Thus we need to solve
the equations
m1+m2+m3+m4+⋯=n(e−⌈ep⌉)m1+2m2+2m3+2m4+⋯=n(e−⌈ep2⌉)m1+2m2+3m3+3m4+⋯=n(e−⌈ep3⌉)ETC.
The solution is mi=n(⌈epi−1⌉−2⌈epi⌉+⌈epi+1⌉). Therefore
(Fp[X]/⟨f(X)e⟩)×=R×≅(R/J)××(1+J)≅Zpn−1×(Zn(e−2⌈ep⌉+⌈ep2⌉)p×Zn(⌈ep⌉−2⌈ep2⌉+⌈ep3⌉)p2×Zn(⌈ep2⌉−2⌈ep3⌉+⌈ep4⌉)p3×⋯).
No comments:
Post a Comment