My thoughts was to take f(x)=cos(1x) for all x∈[0,1) as I know this function is continous from [0,1) and is definitely not uniformly continuous as it oscilates non-uniformly. My trouble is with the proof.
To prove continuity would I:
Fix x0∈[0,1),ϵ>0. We will show that there exists δ>0 such that if |x−x0|<δ then |cos(1x)−cos(1x0)|<ϵ
Now I am stuck as to how I could simplify |cos(1x)−cos(1x0)| or what δ to choose. Any help would be appreciated.
Answer
Here's some intuition:
The Heine-Cantor theorem tells us that any function between two metric spaces that is continuous on a compact set is also uniformly continuous on that set (see here for discussion). Next, if f:X→Y is a uniformly continuous function, it is easy to show that the restriction of f to any subset of X is itself uniformly continuous*. Therefore, because [0,1] is compact, the functions [0,1)→R that are continuous but not uniformly continuous are those functions that cannot be extended to [0,1] in a continuous fashion.
For example, consider the function f:[0,1)→R defined such that f(x)=x. We can extend f to [0,1] by defining f(1)=1, and this extension is a continuous function over a compact set (hence it is uniformly continuous). So the restriction of this extension to [0,1)—i.e. the original function—is necessarily also uniformly continuous per (*) above.
How can we find a continuous function on [0,1) that cannot be continuously extended to [0,1]? There are two ways:
∙ Construct f so that lim
\qquad \bullet \quad Construct f so that \displaystyle \lim_{x \to 1} f(x) does not exist
Note that if \displaystyle \lim_{x \to 1} f(x) exists, taking f(1) to be that limit yields a continuous extension. Indeed, \displaystyle \lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c) is literally one of the definitions for continuity at the point x=c.
The first bullet is ruled out by the stipulation that f be bounded, so moving on to the second bullet, we need to make sure \displaystyle \lim_{x \to 1} f(x) does not exist. One way of doing this (the only way I believe) is to have f oscillate infinitely rapidly with non-vanishing amplitude as x \to 1. It looks like this is what you were trying to exploit, and what José Carlos Santos did (+1) in his answer (see graph below): \displaystyle f(x) = \cos \left(\frac{1}{1-x} \right).
Generalizing his epsilon-delta argument, you can see that this condition is not only necessary, but also sufficient.
No comments:
Post a Comment