Sunday, 4 December 2016

calculus - What is the logic behind decomposing a derivative operator symbol. In the population growth equation?






dydt=Ky



1ydydt=K



...then my teacher did something illogical he decomposed the Differential operator dydt into 1dtdy and used this "form" with the laws of arithmetic to "cancel" the 1dt by multiplying both sides by dt



dtdydt1y=Kdt




dy=Kydt



Why is this possible?
Is it related to the chain rule?


Answer



The proper way to think about this is as follows:



dydt=Ky1ydydt=K.




Thus



1ydydtK=0.



However



1ydydt=ddtlog|y(t)|.



Thus if we integrate our equation with respect to t, what we find is that




(ddtlog|y(t)|K)dt=C.



Using the fundamental theorem of calculus we get



log|y(t)|Kt=C



which can be easily solved. As you see, we used the relation 1ydydt=ddtlog|y(t)| which relies on chain rule (since y is a function of t). The symbolic manipulation your professor did (which many people do) is really just a repackaging of the chain rule. It's not rigorous since the notation dydt is not meant to represent a fraction - it is merely notation adapted from ΔyΔx representing slopes of secant lines. It is convenient notation as such calculations show (you can kind of think of it as a fraction without too many issues in 1D).


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...