dydt=Ky
1ydydt=K
...then my teacher did something illogical he decomposed the Differential operator dydt into 1dt∗dy and used this "form" with the laws of arithmetic to "cancel" the 1dt by multiplying both sides by dt
dt∗dydt1y=K∗dt
dy=K∗y∗dt
Why is this possible?
Is it related to the chain rule?
Answer
The proper way to think about this is as follows:
dydt=Ky⟺1ydydt=K.
Thus
1ydydt−K=0.
However
1ydydt=ddtlog|y(t)|.
Thus if we integrate our equation with respect to t, what we find is that
∫(ddtlog|y(t)|−K)dt=C.
Using the fundamental theorem of calculus we get
log|y(t)|−Kt=C
which can be easily solved. As you see, we used the relation 1ydydt=ddtlog|y(t)| which relies on chain rule (since y is a function of t). The symbolic manipulation your professor did (which many people do) is really just a repackaging of the chain rule. It's not rigorous since the notation dydt is not meant to represent a fraction - it is merely notation adapted from ΔyΔx representing slopes of secant lines. It is convenient notation as such calculations show (you can kind of think of it as a fraction without too many issues in 1D).
No comments:
Post a Comment