Evaluate
limR→∞∫γ(0;R)p(z)q(z)dz
where p and q are polynomials and deg p<deg q−1.
Well what I tried to do was find an estimate for the quotient p(z)/q(z). Let
p(z)=m∑n=0anzn,q(z)=k∑n=0bkzk
where $m
Now, by the estimation theorem:
|∫γ(0;R)p(z)q(z)dz|≤∫2π0R|a0|+|a1|R+⋯+|am|Rm|b0|−|b1|R−⋯−|bk|Rkdt
and since $m+1
But I'm not sure if this is quite right or if I let some parts unjustified. Thanks in advance!
Answer
This is almost correct, but be careful with the denominator of your fraction: |∑mn=0anzn∑kn=0bnzn|≤|a0|+|a1|R+⋯+|am|Rm|b0|−|b1|R−⋯−|bk|Rk
will actually be false for large R because the denominator of the right-hand side will be negative (since the dominating term will be |bk|Rk). What you can say is that if R is large enough so that |bk|Rk>|b0|+⋯+|bk−1|Rk−1, then by the reverse triangle inequality |∑bnzn|≥|bk|Rk−|bk−1|Rk−1−⋯−|b0|>0
and so |∑mn=0anzn∑kn=0bnzn|≤|a0|+|a1|R+⋯+|am|Rm|bk|Rk−|bk−1|Rk−1−⋯−|b0|.
Note that it is essential that we know that |bk|Rk−|bk−1|Rk−1−⋯−|b0|>0, since otherwise the direction of the inequality might flip when we divide.
You might also want to justify more why the integrand goes to 0 as R→∞. You can explain this by proving, for instance, that for R sufficiently large, the numerator will be at most 2|am|Rm and the denominator will be at least 12|bk|Rk.
No comments:
Post a Comment