Monday, 18 March 2019

Principal (and secondary) square roots of a complex number



This is a follow-up of the post here:



using phasors to handle complex numbers




I have decided to create a new post as now I am considering a deeper issue.



Say if we want to compute 5. If I want to find its principal square root then I can use phasor arithmetic as follows:
5=5180=590=5i.
This agrees with the definition namely (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root#Principal_square_root_of_a_complex_number ):



If z=reψi with π<ψπ, then the principal
square root of z is defined as z=reψi2.



And we also have the definition that the other square root is simply 1 times the principal square root. So for 5, we have the principal square root as

5i and the other root as 5i. This is OK as 5i×5i=5270×5270=5540=5180=5.



Now let's consider two intricate cases




  1. 1×1=1180×1180=1360=1(360360)=10=1 (as the principal square root).


  2. 11=101180=1180=1(180+360)=1180=190=i (as the principal square root).





In regard with the above two cases, can we say that another root of 1×1 is 1 ( i.e. -ve of the principal square root) and that another root of 11 is i (i.e -ve of the principal square root)?



If we check:



For, 1×1 having a second root as 1, we have
on squaring, 1180×1180=1360=10=1. This is equivalent to squaring the principal square root i.e. 1 to give also 1.



For 11 having a second root as i we have
on squaring, i×i=1270×1270=1540=1180=1. This is equivalent to squaring the principal square root i.e. i to give also 1.




So 1×1=1(principal root)or1 and 11=i(principal root)ori. Is this correct?



Thanks a lot...


Answer



It's mathematical semantics. The square root function, which is what z denotes by convention, only takes on a single value - in which case equations like 1×1=1 are false. However one can refer to "square roots" as solutions to the equations of the form x2=a, in which case statements like x=1 or 1 are meaningful, but the general practice is simple to write ±a to refer to either value within a single equation or statement.



Bottom line: there are two "square roots," but symbolically z only refers to the principal root.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...