Since limx→∞(log(x)√x)=0, we can conclude that log(x)∈o(√x).
This implies that √x∈O(log(x)). Yet, looking at the graphs, there doesn't seem to be a constant multiple of log(x) that √x is always less than, because √x just keeps getting bigger.
Not sure what I'm missing here, any help is appreciated.
Answer
f(x)∈o(g(x)) does not imply that g(x)∈O(f(x)). For example, x∈o(x2), but surely x2∉O(x). What you might write is that x2∈ω(x). (Some people say that g(x)∈ω(f(x)) if f(x)/g(x) converges to 0, as x→∞.)
Loosely speaking, f∈O(g) means that f/g is bounded in the long run, and f∈o(g) means that f(x)/g(x) diminishes to zero as x→∞. So you see, f∈o(g) merely implies f∈O(g); g/f can very well be unbounded!
No comments:
Post a Comment