I am asked to find a 2×2 matrix with real and whole entries given it's characteristic polynomial:
p2−5p+1.
This is what I have done thus far:
I equated the polynomial to zero, and the roots (eigenvalues) were found to be 2.5+/−√(21/2
I named the matrix to be solved C,
so det product of eigenvalues = 1
trace(C) = sum of eigenvalues =5
I then tried to find C by solving T^{-1} \times D \times T, where D is a matrix whose diagonal entries are the eigenvalues solved above, and T is any matrix who's determinant is non zero.
I used T as a 2 \times 2 being
\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.
I solved T^{-1} \times D \times T, and threw it in a calculator to make sure I made no algebraic mistakes, but the answer I received is wrong.
I appreciate any help, thank you.
Answer
Let's start off by looking at the characteristic polynomial of the 2 \times 2 matrix
A = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -a & -b \end{bmatrix}: \tag 1
\det (A - \lambda I) = \det \left (\begin{bmatrix} -\lambda & 1 \\ -a & -b - \lambda \end{bmatrix} \right ) = \lambda^2 + b\lambda + a; \tag 2
we see from (2) that we may always present a 2 \times 2 matrix with given characteristic polynomial \lambda^2 + b\lambda + a in the form A; for example, if he quadratic is \lambda^2 + 5\lambda + 1, as in the present problem (tho' I have replaced p with \lambda), we may take
P = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & -5 \end{bmatrix}, \tag 3
which may be easily checked:
\det(P - \lambda I) = -\lambda(-5 - \lambda) - 1 ( -1) = \lambda^2 + 5\lambda + 1. \tag 4
The matrices A and P above are part of a general paradigm for constructing matrices with a given characteristic polynomial, and it extends to higher dimensions. Now, there are a very many matrices possessed of a given characteristic polynomial, since it is a similarity invariant; that is, the characteristic polynomials of X and S^{-1}XS are always the same; thus it behooves us to find a matrix of particularly simple, general form for a given polynomial. If
q(\lambda) = \displaystyle \sum_1^n q_i \lambda^i, \; q_n = 1, \tag5
we define C(q(\lambda)) to be the n \times n matrix
C(q(\lambda)) = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 & \ldots & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & \ldots & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ldots & \vdots & \vdots \\ -q_0 & -q_1 & -q_2 & \ldots & -q_{n - 1} \end{bmatrix}; \tag 6
that is, C(q(\lambda)) has all 1s on the superdiagonal, the negatives of the coefficients of q(\lambda) on the n-th row, and 0s everywhere else. We have
C(q(\lambda) - \lambda I = \begin{bmatrix} -\lambda & 1 & 0 & \ldots & 0 \\ 0 & -\lambda & 1 & \ldots & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ldots & \vdots & \vdots \\ -q_0 & -q_1 & -q_2 & \ldots & -q_{n - 1} - \lambda \end{bmatrix}; \tag 7
it is easy to see, by expanding in minors along the n-th row, that
\det(C(q(\lambda)) - \lambda I) = q(\lambda); \tag 8
also, since a matrix and its transpose have equal determinants, the transposed form C(q(\lambda)), C^T(q(\lambda)), also gives rise to the same characteristic polynomial. The matrices C(q(\lambda)) and C^T(q(\lambda)) are known as companion matrices for the polynomial q(\lambda); the linked article has more of the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment