Tuesday, 3 June 2014

abstract algebra - Help check my proof that the splitting field of irreducible f(x)inBbbFp[x] with degree n is BbbFpn



Let f(x)Fp[x] be irreducible with degree n. I come up with my proof that the splitting field of f(x) over Fp is exactly Fpn.



Let K be the splitting field of f(x) over Fp. Let all roots of f(x) be α1, α2, , αn. Since the minimal polynomial of α1 is f(x), [Fp(α1):Fp]=n. And then Fp(α1)Fpn. Using the same arguements on α2, , αn, we get that Fp(α1)FpnFp(α2)Fp(α3)Fp(αn). And notice that all Fp(αi)'s are contained in K. Thus by a theorem in finite field (the introduction book of Hungerford had listed it as an exercise), Fp(α1)=Fp(α2)==Fp(αn).




Therefore, Fp(α1) contains all of the roots of f(x), and so Fp(α1) is the splitting field of f(x) over Fp (i.e. Fp(α1)=K). And Fp(α1) is isomorphic to Fpn. QED.



Is the proof correct?


Answer



Your proof is fine. You may want to qualify that f is the minimal polynomial of αi over Fp.



Also, your proof implicitly uses the following two claims:





  • That every field extension of degree n of Fp is isomorphic to Fpn.

  • That if two finite subfields of a given field (here K) are isomorphic, then they are the same. You quote this as an exercise.



Depending on the context you may or may not want to substantiate these claims.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...