Sunday, 30 August 2015

calculus - Calculate limntoinftybinom2nn without using L'Hôpital's rule.



Questions:



(1) Calculate



limn(2nn)




(2) Calculate



limn(2nn)2n



without using L'Hôpital's rule.



Attempted answers:



(1)




Here I start by using the definition of a binomial:



limn(2nn)=limn(2n)!n!(2nn)!=limn(2n)!n!n!=limn2n(2n1)(2n2)...(n+1)n!n!n!



Canceling one n! gives:



limn2n(2n1)(2n2)...(n+1)n!



Here I argue that, surely, the numerator grows faster than the denominator and so the result must be that the limit grows towards . Is this sufficiently mathematically rigorous?




(2)



My first attempt looked at the binomial theorem in an effort to get the expression to look something like the general form:



(a+b)n=nk=0akbnk



but it does not quite seem to match, since k would have to be 0 so that a becomes =1 does not interfere, but then nk would be n instead.



My second attempt was to do what I did in (1), but then multiply it by 2n:




limn2n(2n1)(2n2)...(n+1)n!12n



Now we can cancel one of the 2s in the 2n for every second factor in the numerator since they (i.e. 2n, 2n-2) are divisible by 2. But there are n factors in the numerator, so at most n2 factors can be canceled.



Issues:



(a) is my answer to (1) sufficiently mathematically rigorous? Is it really "obvious" that the numerator grows faster or are there additional arguments that should be provided for the argument to be convincing?



(b) what are some more productive approaches to question (2)?


Answer




For part (1), letting an:=(2nn), you should be able to show that an+1an=(2n+2)(2n+1)(n+1)2=2(2n+1)n+1=3+n1n+13.

Put another way, an+13an for all n, which should allow you to conclude readily that an3n for all n, at which point you're pretty much done.



As for (2), I would delay cancellation, working from (2n)!2nn!n!

instead. You can transform the numerator into the product of the first n odd positive integers, and the denominator into n!, then proceed from there in a similar fashion to part (1).



Added: More straightforwardly, part (1) allows you to conclude that (2nn)2n(32)n

for all n, whence (2) is easy.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...