I am trying to solve the following problem:
Let Tij(c)∈SL2(Z) (i≠j) be the elementary matrix which represents the elementary row operation of adding the j-th row multiplied by c to the i-th row, A:=T12(2) and B:=T21(2). Let G be a subgroup \left\{ \begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}\in\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb Z):a\equiv d\equiv 1 \pmod 4, b\equiv c\equiv 0 \pmod 2 \right\}. Show that G = \langle A, B\rangle.
That \langle A,B\rangle\subset G can be shown easily by induction. The problem is the converse inclusion. I tried to show it by using an analogy from the fact that \mathrm{SL}_2 is generated by T_{ij}(c). I tried to show that if C\in G is written as a product C_1\dots C_n, where each C_k is of the form T_{i_kj_k}(c_k), then each c_k is even, from which what I want to show follows. However I cannot prove this (it may simply be wrong).
I would be grateful if you could provide a clue.
Answer
I want to go by infinite descent, and to show that we can always make a given non-identity element of the group smaller
by multiplying it with a generator or its inverse from the left or right. The trick is then to define "smaller" in a way that this is always possible. This is not guaranteed to work in general, but it is a natural thing to try.
Let g=\pmatrix{a&b\cr c&d\cr} be an element of G. Let us first assume that bd\neq0. While that holds, I measure the size of g by the absolute value of the product of the diagonal elements |ad|. The task at hand is then to prove that one of the matrices Ag, A^{-1}g, Bg, B^{-1}g, gA, gA^{-1}, gB, gB^{-1} is smaller than g in the prescribed sense. In other words we want to make g smaller by adding one of its rows or columns to the other multiplied by \pm2 (multiplication by an elementary matrix from the right amount an elementary column operation).
W.l.o.g. we can assume that |a|\ge |d| (make the obvious changes to the row/column operations below, if that is not the case. Then it is impossible that
both inequalities |b|>|a| and |c|>|a| hold, as then |bc|>|ad| and the congruences would imply that |\det g|\ge3. So we have either |b|<|a| or |c|<|a|. In the former case we can decrease |a| by adding the second column multiplied by one of \pm2 to the first. As |d| does not change we have the desired conclusion. In the latter case we add a multiply of the second row multiplied by \pm2 to the first for similar effect.
The above operation make g smaller in the prescribed sense unless one of the off-diagonal elements is zero. I leave that case to you with the hint that if b=0 or c=0, then you can easily show that a=d=1.
The claim follows. The idea is that if A and B did not generate all of G, there would be a "minimal" missing element.
No comments:
Post a Comment