Wednesday, 2 August 2017

abstract algebra - Two elements of mathbbFqm that share the same minimal polynomial over mathbbFq have the same multiplicative order



Let Fqm be the field with qm elements, where q is a prime number (constructed as the quotient field Fq[x]/(p), where p is an irreducible, monic polynomial over Fq). Let α,βFqm, so that α and β share the same the same minimal polynomial mα over Fq.



I now want to show that α,β have the same order in F×qm (the multiplicative group of Fqm). Using that, I'm then supposed to conclude that mϕ(qm1), where ϕ is Euler's totient function.



Now my idea was to maybe look at the multiplicative, cyclic subgroup α of F×qm (the subgroup that's generated by α). Now we have α∣= order of α in F×qm=:ordF×qm(α).




Now I suspect that it's true that α=β, from which the first statement would follow right away. But I'm not sure how I could derive that from only the fact that α,β are roots of the same minimal polynomial in Fq.



(I'm also open to any other approaches – this was just the first that came to mind.)


Answer



The multiplicative order of α is the minimum k such that α is a root of xk1.



Now if F is a field and fF[x], the following are equivalent




  • α is a root of f, and


  • the minimal polynomial of α over F divides f.






So the multiplicative order of α is the minimum k such that mαxk1. And the multiplicative order of β is the minimum h such that mβxh1. But mα=mβ, thus...






As to the second part, φ(qm1) is the number of generators of the cyclic group of non-zero elements of the field with qm elements. Every such generator generates the field with qm elements over the field with q elements, and thus its minimal polynomial over the field with q elements has degree m. But by the first part all the m roots of such a minimal polynomial have the same multiplicative order, hence the number of generators of the cyclic group of non-zero elements of the field with qm elements is a multiple of m.



No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...