Wednesday, 14 August 2013

real analysis - If f(xy)=f(x)f(y), then f(x)=xb.



I'm trying to prove that if g:R+R, defined by g(uv)=g(u)+g(v), for all u,vR+, g continuous, then g(x)=blnx




In order to prove this, I'm trying to prove that if there is a function f:RR such that f(xy)=f(x)f(y), then f(x)=xb,bR.



If I prove the last statement, I prove the question. First, I was trying this by induction on N, what I found very difficult to prove.



I need help. Thanks!


Answer



Your approach has problems because, when, say, b=1/2, xb is not defined on all of R.



The safer approach is to prove that if h:RR is continuous, and for all x,yR, h(x)+h(y)=h(x+y), then there is a b such that h(x)=bx for all x.




Setting h(x)=g(ex) above, from this result it would follow since h(x+y)=g(exey)=g(ex)+g(eu)=h(x)+h(y)



So for z>0, g(z)=h(logz)=blogz.



To prove this statement about h, we proceed by first proving it for natural numbers x, then for positive rational numbers x, and then for all rationals, and then finally for all real x.



We first show h(0)=0. Then we show that h(x)=h(x) for all x. Both of these follow relatively directly from the condition on h.



Then we show by induction that if n is a natural number and x any real, then h(nx)=nh(x).




In particular, if x=1, this means that h(n)=nh(1). Let b=h(1). So h(n)=bn for all natural numbers n.



Then we show that if x=m/n is a positive rational number, then bm=h(m)=h(nx)=nh(x) so h(x)=bmn=bx for x positive rational, as well.



Now, if f(x)=bx, then f(x)=f(x)=bx=b(x). So this means that f(x)=bx for all rationals x.



But since the we assumed h was continuous, this means that h(x)=bx for all real number numbers. (This is why you need continuity.)



[I've left out some of the steps - the induction argument, the h(0)=0 and h(x)=h(x) steps.]



No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find lim without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...