Proving the statement below is sufficient, but any proof will be enjoyed!
Statement:
For any f:R→R differentiable over all reals, one can find a function G:[0,1]×C→C defined such that:
- G is differentiable over x
- G(a,G(b,x))=G(a+b,x) for 0<=a+b<=1
- G(0,x)=x;
- G(1,x)=f(x)
Given the G above:
- Is G unique? If not, how many such functions exist for a given f?
- Is G differentiable over a?
If you can relax the condition to continuous f and G that would be even cooler.
EDIT:
In response to a proof that there exists no G for monotonously shrinking f, such as f(x)=−x I decided to relax the demand for G from G:[0,1]×R→R to G:[0,1]×C→C, which allows you to make an infinite number of functions matching my requests simply by saying G(a,x)=x∗(f(x)/x)a for any k∈N which makes the whole thing a bit trivial. My original question has been answered and the remaining one doesn't seem to be too interesting. What's the policy here? Should I delete the page?
EDIT 2: D'oh! G(a,x)=x∗(f(x)/x)a only works for linear functions. Disregard edit 1. My statement has still been disproved though, the answer will be accepted as soon as I figure out how.
Answer
You seem to be looking for a fractional iterate of any f:R→R; that is, to extend the notion or construct of f∘n to reals n for which n∉N, but still keeping within the domain of continuous functions. For trivial reasons, not possible for any monotone decreasing function f. Like f(x)=−x. So there can not be such a G.
Since I think cow-slowly, I may have misunderstood your question completely. If so, pardon it, I’ll remove.
EDIT: Probably my “trivial reasons” weren’t clear enough. First, your fractional iterate, in particular f∘1/2, the “half-fold iterate”, must be one-to-one and onto R. If continuous, it must turn intervals into intervals (continuous image of a connected is connected) and bounded closed intervals into b.c. intervals (continuous image of a compact is compact). It results that any continuous one-to-one onto map of R must be monotone increasing or monotone decreasing, and of course strictly so. But the composition of two decreasing functions is increasing. Thus f(x)=−1 can not be the “composition-square” of any continuous function.
No comments:
Post a Comment