Thursday, 12 May 2016

number theory - least common multiple limsqrt[n][1,2,dotsc,n]=e




The least common multiple of 1,2,,n is [1,2,,n], then



lim






we can show this by prime number theorem, but I don't know how to start



I had learnt that it seems we can find the proposition in G.H. Hardy's number theory book, but I could not find it.




I am really grateful for any help


Answer



Let's look how the least common multiple evolves.



If n > 1 is a prime power, n = p^k (k \geqslant 1), then no number < n is divisible by p^k, but p^{k-1} < n, so [1,2,\dotsc,n-1] = p^{k-1}\cdot m, where p\nmid m. Then [1,2,\dotsc,n] = p^k\cdot m, since on the one hand, we see that p^k\cdot m is a common multiple of 1,2,\dotsc,n, and on the other hand, every common multiple of 1,2,\dotsc,n must be a multiple of p^k as well as of m.



If n > 1 is not a prime power, it is divisible by at least two distinct primes, say p is one of them. Let k be the exponent of p in the factorisation of n, and m = n/p^k. Then 1 < p^k < n and 1 < m < n, so p^k\mid [1,2,\dotsc,n-1] and m\mid [1,2,\dotsc,n-1], and since the two are coprime, also n = p^k\cdot m \mid [1,2,\dotsc,n-1], which means that then [1,2,\dotsc,n] = [1,2,\dotsc,n-1].



Taking logarithms, we see that for n > 1




\begin{align} \Lambda (n) &= \log [1,2,\dotsc,n] - \log [1,2,\dotsc,n-1]\\ &= \begin{cases} \log p &, n = p^k\\ \;\: 0 &, \text{otherwise}.\end{cases} \end{align}



\Lambda is the von Mangoldt function, and we see that



\log [1,2,\dotsc,n] = \sum_{k\leqslant n} \Lambda(k) = \psi(n),



where \psi is known as the second Chebyshev function.




With these observations, it is clear that



\lim_{n\to\infty} \sqrt[n]{[1,2,\dotsc,n]} = e\tag{1}



is equivalent to



\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{\psi(n)}{n} = 1.\tag{2}



It is well-known and easy to see that (2) is equivalent to the Prime Number Theorem (without error bounds)




\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{\pi(x)\log x}{x} = 1.\tag{3}



To see the equivalence, we also introduce the first Chebyshev function,



\vartheta(x) = \sum_{p\leqslant x} \log p,



where the sum extends over the primes not exceeding x. We have



\vartheta(x) \leqslant \psi(x) = \sum_{n\leqslant x}\Lambda(n) = \sum_{p\leqslant x}\left\lfloor \frac{\log x}{\log p}\right\rfloor\log p \leqslant \sum_{p\leqslant x} \log x = \pi(x)\log x,




which shows - the existence of the limits assumed -



\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{\vartheta(x)}{x} \leqslant \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{\psi(x)}{x} \leqslant \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{\pi(x)\log x}{x}.



For n \geqslant 3, we can split the sum at y = \frac{x}{(\log x)^2} and obtain



\pi(x) \leqslant \pi(y) + \sum_{y < p \leqslant x} 1 \leqslant \pi(y) + \frac{1}{\log y}\sum_{y < p < x}\log p \leqslant y + \frac{\vartheta(x)}{\log y},



whence




\frac{\pi(x)\log x}{x} \leqslant \frac{y\log x}{x} + \frac{\log x}{\log y}\frac{\vartheta(x)}{x} = \frac{1}{\log x} + \frac{1}{1 - 2\frac{\log \log x}{\log x}}\frac{\vartheta(x)}{x}.



Since \frac{1}{\log x}\to 0 and \frac{\log\log x}{\log x} \to 0 for x\to \infty, it follows that (once again assuming the existence of the limits)



\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{\pi(x)\log x}{x} \leqslant \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{\vartheta(x)}{x},



and the proof of the equivalence of (1) and (3) is complete.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}

How to find \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h} without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...