Wednesday 11 December 2019

algebra precalculus - Is this an incorrect proof of $cot (x)+tan(x)=csc(x)sec(x)$?

If you input the trig identity:
$$\cot (x)+\tan(x)=\csc(x)\sec(x)$$
Into WolframAlpha, it gives the following proof:



Expand into basic trigonometric parts:
$$\frac{\cos(x)}{\sin(x)} + \frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)} \stackrel{?}{=} \frac{1}{\sin(x)\cos(x)}$$
Put over a common denominator:



$$\frac{\cos^2(x)+\sin^2(x)}{\cos(x)\sin(x)} \stackrel{?}{=} \frac{1}{\sin(x)\cos(x)}$$




Use the Pythagorean identity $\cos^2(x)+\sin^2(x)=1$:



$$\frac{1}{\sin(x)\cos(x)} \stackrel{?}{=} \frac{1}{\sin(x)\cos(x)}$$



And finally simplify into



$$1\stackrel{?}{=} 1$$



The left and right side are identical, so the identity has been verified.




However, I take some issue with this. All this is doing is manipulating a statement that we don't know the veracity of into a true statement. And I've learned that any false statement can prove any true statement, so if this identity was wrong you could also reduce it to a true statement.



Obviously, this proof can be easily adapted into a proof by simply manipulating one side into the other, but:



Is this proof correct on its own? And can the steps WolframAlpha takes be justified, or is it completely wrong?

No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find $lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}$

How to find $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h}$ without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...