Show that sup for f continuous and positive on [a,b]. I can show that LHS is greater than or equal to RHS but I can't show the other direction.
Answer
Let F = \sup_{\xi\in[a,b]} f(\xi). If F=0, the equality is trivial. So we may suppose suppose F>0.
Choose \epsilon \in (0,F), and let A_\epsilon = \{x | f(x) \geq F-\epsilon\}. Since f is continuous, we have mA_\epsilon > 0 (m is the Lebesgue measure). Then the following is true (work from the middle towards the left or right to get the relevant bound):
mA_\epsilon (F-\epsilon)^n \leq \int_{A_\epsilon} (F-\epsilon)^n dx \leq I^n_n = \int_a^b (f(x))^n dx \leq \int_a^b F^n dx \leq (b-a) F^n
This gives \sqrt[n]{mA_\epsilon} (F-\epsilon) \leq I_n \leq \sqrt[n]{b-a}F.
We have \lim_{n \to \infty}\sqrt[n]{mA_\epsilon} = 1 and \lim_{n \to \infty}\sqrt[n]{b-a} = 1, hence \limsup_{n \to \infty} I_n \leq F and \liminf_{n \to \infty} I_n \geq F-\epsilon. Since this is true for \epsilon arbitrarily close to 0, we have \liminf_{n \to \infty} I_n \geq F, from which the desired result follows.
(Note: If you wish to avoid the Lebesgue measure, note that A_\epsilon could be taken to be any non-empty interval such that f(x) \geq F-\epsilon for x in this interval. Then mA_\epsilon would be replaced by the length of this interval. The same reasoning still applies.)
No comments:
Post a Comment