Tuesday, 3 December 2019

limits - Does any f(x) which for large x grows slower than any power of x necessarily satisfy limxtoinftyf(x)=0?



The title is essentially the question. Intuitively I would await that any function f(x), which for large x grows slower than any power of x, must necessarily satisfy



limxf(x)=0.



This holds at least for prominent examples like ln(x) and x. But I don't know of a statement that it holds in general. Does anyone know or have a proof or counter examples?



Thanks for help!




EDIT: I forgot to mention that f should also be strictly monotonically increasing, for large x, and also that it should be smooth (C(R)).


Answer



I assume that f is differentiable (otherwise f(x) is meaningless).



Assuming the limit exists, it must be 0.



Otherwise, if limx+f(x)=L>0


then there exists x0>0 such that for x>x0 necessarily
f(x)>L2
This implies that f(x)=f(x0)+xx0f(t)dt>f(x0)+L2(xx0)

which contradicts our hypothesis that f grows slower than x.




However, nothing ensures that the limit exists. As a counterexample, you could consider
f(x)=x0|sint|tdt


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...