Saturday, 3 August 2013

real analysis - CheckMyProof: $f$ is bounded, uniformly continuous $implies e^{f}$ is bounded, uniformly cts.




Let $~f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ be bounded and uniformly continuous.
Show that $e^f$ is also bounded and uniformly continuous.




My approach (with 5xum's extensive help) goes as follows:





  1. $f$ bounded $\implies$ $e^f$ bounded



Since there exists an $M \in \mathbb{R}_{>0}$ so that $|f(x)| \leq M$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$, by the continuity and monotonicity of $e^x: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$, we can see that $|e^{f(x)}| = e^{f(x)} \leq e^M ~\forall x \in \mathbb{R}$.







  1. $f$ uniformly continouos. $\implies$ $e^f$ uniformly continuous.




We want to show that
$$
\forall \varepsilon' > 0 ~\exists \delta' > 0 ~\forall x,y \in \mathbb{R}: (|x-y| < \delta' \implies |e^{f(x)} - e^{f(y)}| < \varepsilon')
$$
Let $\varepsilon' > 0$ be fixed and set $\varepsilon := \frac{\varepsilon'}{2 M} > 0$, where $M$ is the bound of $\max\{e^{f(x)},e^{f(y)}\}$, meaning $|e^{f(x)}|, |e^{f(y)}| \leq M ~\forall x,y \in \mathbb{R}~~(*_2)$.



Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, the following holds
$$
\forall \varepsilon > 0 ~\exists \delta > 0 ~\forall x,y \in \mathbb{R}: |x - y| < \delta \implies |f(x) - f(y)| < \varepsilon ~~(*_1)

$$



Now, let $\delta > 0$ be so that $|x - y| < \delta$ and without loss of generality let $f(y) \geq f(x) ~\forall x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Then we obtain
$$
\begin{align*}
|e^{f(x)} - e^{f(y)}| = |e^{f(x)}| |1 - e^{f(y) - f(x)}|
&= e^{f(x)} |e^{|f(y) - f(x)|} - 1| \\
&\overset{(*)}{<} 2 e^{f(x)} |f(x) - f(y)| \\
&\overset{(*_1)}{<} 2 e^{f(x)} \varepsilon \\
&\overset{(*_2)}{\leq} 2 \varepsilon M \\

&=\varepsilon'
\end{align*}
$$



Where $(*)$ can be done because $|e^u - 1| < 2u ~~\forall u \in (0,1]$.


Answer





  1. $f$ bounded $\implies$ $e^f$ bounded




trivial because of the monotonicity of $e^x$ ??




My professor had a favourite saying: "Dear colleague, 'trivial' and 'obvious' are my words. They are not yours to use."



If what you wrote is so trivial, then you should be able to prove it in $3$ lines, and if you are able to prove in $3$ lines, then just do it.



Beside, $f(x)=\frac1{x-1}$ is a monotonic function on $(0,1)$, but it is not bounded, so your argument obviously needs work.









  1. $f$ uniformly cts. $\implies$ $e^f$ uniformly cts.



We want to show that $$ \forall \varepsilon' > 0 ~\exists \delta' > 0
> \forall x,y \in \mathbb{R}: (|x-y| < \delta' \implies |f(x) - f(y)| <
> \varepsilon') $$





No. We assume that what you wrote is true. What we need to prove is the following:



$$\forall\epsilon >0 \exists \delta > 0 \forall x,y\in\mathbb R:(|x-y|<\delta\implies |e^{f(x)} - e^{f(y)}| < \epsilon)$$



You need to prove the uniform continuity of $e^f$, while assuming that $f$ is uniformly continuous and bounded.







After your edit:



Part 1 is ok now.



Part 2 is still strange.



First problem:




Let $\varepsilon > 0$ be fixed and $\varepsilon' > 2 M \varepsilon >0$





This is very strange. Your proof should start with "Let $\varepsilon' > 0$", not "$\varepsilon > 0$." I think this is only a consequence of sloppy writing, though, so you should write, instead of the above,




Let $\varepsilon' > 0$ be fixed and set $\varepsilon = \frac{\varepsilon'}{2M}$




And then the proof should work out.




Second problem:




From $|x - y| < \delta$ follows that $|f(x) - f(y)| < \varepsilon$ because $f$ is uniformly cts.




This is very sloppy writing. What is $\delta$ equal to here? You haven't defined $\delta$, it just appeared out of the blue. This is another example of sloppy writing that must be fixed.



Third problem:





$$|e^{f(x)} - e^{f(y)}| =
|e^{f(x)}| |e^{|f(x) - f(y)|} - 1|$$




This is false if $f(x)

Fourth problem:





$$|e^{f(x)}| |e^{|f(x) - f(y)|} - 1| <
e^{f(x)} |e^{\varepsilon} - 1|$$




How do you know this inequality is true? If I were you, I would first use the knowledge you write in $*$ before going for the estimate with $\delta$...






After your second edit:




Slight problem:



Don't say "let $\delta$ be fixed", better to just say "let $\delta$ be such that if $|x-y|<\delta$, then $|f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon$. That way, it's clear you only fix one number ($\epsilon$) and then "calculate" what $\delta$ is.



Bigger mistake:



You still wrote




$$|e^{f(x)}| |1 - e^{f(y) - f(x)}| =

e^{f(x)} |e^{|f(y) - f(x)|} - 1|$$




which is not true, since, for $f(x)=1$ and $f(y)=0$, the left side equals $$|e^1|\cdot |1-e^{0-1}| = e\cdot (1-e^-1) = e-1$$



while the right side equals



$$|e^1|\cdot |e^{|0-1| -1} = e\cdot (e-1)=e^2-1$$


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find $lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{sin(ha)}{h}$

How to find $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{\sin(ha)}{h}$ without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...