Saturday, 3 August 2013

real analysis - CheckMyProof: f is bounded, uniformly continuous impliesef is bounded, uniformly cts.




Let  f:RR be bounded and uniformly continuous.
Show that ef is also bounded and uniformly continuous.




My approach (with 5xum's extensive help) goes as follows:





  1. f bounded ef bounded



Since there exists an MR>0 so that |f(x)|M for all xR, by the continuity and monotonicity of ex:RR, we can see that |ef(x)|=ef(x)eM xR.







  1. f uniformly continouos. ef uniformly continuous.




We want to show that
ε>0 δ>0 x,yR:(|xy|<δ|ef(x)ef(y)|<ε)
Let ε>0 be fixed and set ε:=ε2M>0, where M is the bound of max{ef(x),ef(y)}, meaning |ef(x)|,|ef(y)|M x,yR  (2).



Since f is uniformly continuous, the following holds
ε>0 δ>0 x,yR:|xy|<δ|f(x)f(y)|<ε  (1)



Now, let δ>0 be so that |xy|<δ and without loss of generality let f(y)f(x) x,yR. Then we obtain
|ef(x)ef(y)|=|ef(x)||1ef(y)f(x)|=ef(x)|e|f(y)f(x)|1|()<2ef(x)|f(x)f(y)|(1)<2ef(x)ε(2)2εM=ε



Where () can be done because |eu1|<2u  u(0,1].


Answer





  1. f bounded ef bounded




trivial because of the monotonicity of ex ??




My professor had a favourite saying: "Dear colleague, 'trivial' and 'obvious' are my words. They are not yours to use."



If what you wrote is so trivial, then you should be able to prove it in 3 lines, and if you are able to prove in 3 lines, then just do it.



Beside, f(x)=1x1 is a monotonic function on (0,1), but it is not bounded, so your argument obviously needs work.









  1. f uniformly cts. ef uniformly cts.



We want to show that ε>0 δ>0>x,yR:(|xy|<δ|f(x)f(y)|<>ε)





No. We assume that what you wrote is true. What we need to prove is the following:



ϵ>0δ>0x,yR:(|xy|<δ|ef(x)ef(y)|<ϵ)



You need to prove the uniform continuity of ef, while assuming that f is uniformly continuous and bounded.







After your edit:



Part 1 is ok now.



Part 2 is still strange.



First problem:




Let ε>0 be fixed and ε>2Mε>0





This is very strange. Your proof should start with "Let ε>0", not "ε>0." I think this is only a consequence of sloppy writing, though, so you should write, instead of the above,




Let ε>0 be fixed and set ε=ε2M




And then the proof should work out.




Second problem:




From |xy|<δ follows that |f(x)f(y)|<ε because f is uniformly cts.




This is very sloppy writing. What is δ equal to here? You haven't defined δ, it just appeared out of the blue. This is another example of sloppy writing that must be fixed.



Third problem:





|ef(x)ef(y)|=|ef(x)||e|f(x)f(y)|1|




This is false if $f(x)

Fourth problem:





|ef(x)||e|f(x)f(y)|1|<ef(x)|eε1|




How do you know this inequality is true? If I were you, I would first use the knowledge you write in before going for the estimate with δ...






After your second edit:




Slight problem:



Don't say "let δ be fixed", better to just say "let δ be such that if |xy|<δ, then |f(x)f(y)|<ϵ. That way, it's clear you only fix one number (ϵ) and then "calculate" what δ is.



Bigger mistake:



You still wrote




|ef(x)||1ef(y)f(x)|=ef(x)|e|f(y)f(x)|1|




which is not true, since, for f(x)=1 and f(y)=0, the left side equals |e1||1e01|=e(1e1)=e1



while the right side equals



|e1||e|01|1=e(e1)=e21


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...