Let f:R→R be bounded and uniformly continuous.
Show that ef is also bounded and uniformly continuous.
My approach (with 5xum's extensive help) goes as follows:
- f bounded ⟹ ef bounded
Since there exists an M∈R>0 so that |f(x)|≤M for all x∈R, by the continuity and monotonicity of ex:R→R, we can see that |ef(x)|=ef(x)≤eM ∀x∈R.
- f uniformly continouos. ⟹ ef uniformly continuous.
We want to show that
∀ε′>0 ∃δ′>0 ∀x,y∈R:(|x−y|<δ′⟹|ef(x)−ef(y)|<ε′)
Let ε′>0 be fixed and set ε:=ε′2M>0, where M is the bound of max{ef(x),ef(y)}, meaning |ef(x)|,|ef(y)|≤M ∀x,y∈R (∗2).
Since f is uniformly continuous, the following holds
∀ε>0 ∃δ>0 ∀x,y∈R:|x−y|<δ⟹|f(x)−f(y)|<ε (∗1)
Now, let δ>0 be so that |x−y|<δ and without loss of generality let f(y)≥f(x) ∀x,y∈R. Then we obtain
|ef(x)−ef(y)|=|ef(x)||1−ef(y)−f(x)|=ef(x)|e|f(y)−f(x)|−1|(∗)<2ef(x)|f(x)−f(y)|(∗1)<2ef(x)ε(∗2)≤2εM=ε′
Where (∗) can be done because |eu−1|<2u ∀u∈(0,1].
Answer
- f bounded ⟹ ef bounded
trivial because of the monotonicity of ex ??
My professor had a favourite saying: "Dear colleague, 'trivial' and 'obvious' are my words. They are not yours to use."
If what you wrote is so trivial, then you should be able to prove it in 3 lines, and if you are able to prove in 3 lines, then just do it.
Beside, f(x)=1x−1 is a monotonic function on (0,1), but it is not bounded, so your argument obviously needs work.
- f uniformly cts. ⟹ ef uniformly cts.
We want to show that ∀ε′>0 ∃δ′>0>∀x,y∈R:(|x−y|<δ′⟹|f(x)−f(y)|<>ε′)
No. We assume that what you wrote is true. What we need to prove is the following:
∀ϵ>0∃δ>0∀x,y∈R:(|x−y|<δ⟹|ef(x)−ef(y)|<ϵ)
You need to prove the uniform continuity of ef, while assuming that f is uniformly continuous and bounded.
After your edit:
Part 1 is ok now.
Part 2 is still strange.
First problem:
Let ε>0 be fixed and ε′>2Mε>0
This is very strange. Your proof should start with "Let ε′>0", not "ε>0." I think this is only a consequence of sloppy writing, though, so you should write, instead of the above,
Let ε′>0 be fixed and set ε=ε′2M
And then the proof should work out.
Second problem:
From |x−y|<δ follows that |f(x)−f(y)|<ε because f is uniformly cts.
This is very sloppy writing. What is δ equal to here? You haven't defined δ, it just appeared out of the blue. This is another example of sloppy writing that must be fixed.
Third problem:
|ef(x)−ef(y)|=|ef(x)||e|f(x)−f(y)|−1|
This is false if $f(x)
Fourth problem:
|ef(x)||e|f(x)−f(y)|−1|<ef(x)|eε−1|
How do you know this inequality is true? If I were you, I would first use the knowledge you write in ∗ before going for the estimate with δ...
After your second edit:
Slight problem:
Don't say "let δ be fixed", better to just say "let δ be such that if |x−y|<δ, then |f(x)−f(y)|<ϵ. That way, it's clear you only fix one number (ϵ) and then "calculate" what δ is.
Bigger mistake:
You still wrote
|ef(x)||1−ef(y)−f(x)|=ef(x)|e|f(y)−f(x)|−1|
which is not true, since, for f(x)=1 and f(y)=0, the left side equals |e1|⋅|1−e0−1|=e⋅(1−e−1)=e−1
while the right side equals
|e1|⋅|e|0−1|−1=e⋅(e−1)=e2−1
No comments:
Post a Comment