Monday, 26 October 2015

sequences and series - fracnfrac1nsumni=1frac11ti+fract1tleft(1tnright)leqn?



​Hi there,



I bump into a weird sequence, and know for a fact the following holds.
(Also, I ran MATLAB simulations to double-check.) This sequence comes up when doing research on computing the reliability of a signal to reach the destination when sent through parallel links and the benefit associated with it. (Details can be too long, which might be helpful to get the solution, but I think those who are very good at dealing with sequences don't need it necessarily.)



For any positive integers n and a real number t(0,1), the following holds:



n1nni=111ti+t1t(1tn)n.




I'm struggling to prove this analytically, though. A few techniques that I have tried usually aim at showing an upper bound of LHS is less than or equal to RHS:



The fact that 1t1ti1tn holds for all i=1,,n implies that 11tn1nni=111ti1t holds for all i=1,,n.



Then, LHS is less than or equal to



n(1tn)+t1t(1tn).



Subtracting RHS with the upper bound above, we get




t1t(1+n(1t)tn1+tn).



The terms in the parentheses imply that it is less than zero: consider a binomial distribution with paramters n and t.



A few other attempts similar to the above one failed. I also tried to use Bernoulli's inequality (1+x)n1+nx, but it didn't help. Maybe I applied the techniques sloppily.



I feel like we should either prove it by induction (when n=1, LHS = RHS. Assuming LHS RHS for n, we could show it also is true for n+1.), or we begin with defining a sequence, say Sn=1nni=111ti, and show that the forward difference of LHS is less than or equal to the forward difference of RHS (which is 1).



But, even after hours of effort, I couldn't seem to find a clue. Could anyone help? Thanks!



Answer



Jensen's Inequality and the fact that 11x is convex on (0,1) say that
1nnk=111tk111nnk=1tk


Therefore,
11nnk=111tk+t1t1tnn(11nnk=1tk)+1nnk=1tk=1

n times inequality (2) is the desired inequality.


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...