EDITs
- extension to alternating sums (6)
- extension to general sums with parameter x (8)
- extension to general sums with two parameters (11)
Extended post
The relation
n∑k=1(H(p)kkq+H(q)kkp)=H(p)nH(q)n+H(p+q)n
where H(p)k=∑kj=1j−p, is a nice and important symmetry relation with various applications. Notice the finite upper index n. The proof is not hard.
Corollary 1
If q=p the relation simplifies to
n∑k=1H(p)kkp=12((H(p)n)2+H(2p)n)
Corollary 2
In the limit n→∞ (1) turns into
∞∑k=1(H(p)kkq+H(q)kkp)=ζ(p)ζ(q)+ζ(p+q)
where
ζ(s)=limn→∞H(s)n=∞∑k=1k−s
is the Riemann zeta function.
For q=p formula (3) gives the analogue to (2)
∞∑k=1H(p)kkp=12(ζ(p)2+ζ(2p))
This formula was also given in [1], and there it was claimed that it is valid for real p.
Alternating sums
A similar relation can be derived for alternating sums.
Define
A(p)n=n∑k=1(−1)k1kp
then the basic relation is
n∑k=1(−1)kH(p)kkq+n∑k=1A(q)kkp=H(p)nA(q)n+A(p+q)n
From (6) other corollaries and formulas can be derived in a manner similar to the one for the non-alternating sums described above.
Generalized relation with parameter x
It can be shown with similar methods as before that a more general relation holds from which the two formulas discussed before are special cases.
Let
H(p)n(x)=n∑k=1xkkp
H(p)n is understood as H(p)n(+1) and we have H(p)n(−1)=A(p)n (c.f. (5)).
Then the relation is
n∑k=1(xkH(p)k(1)kq+H(q)k(x)kp)=H(p)n(1)H(q)n(x)+H(p+q)n(x)
Notice that this relation has lost the symmetry.
For x=1 and x=−1 we recover the relations (1) and (6), respectively.
In the limit n→∞ we encounter on the right hand side the polylog function
limn→∞H(p)n(x)=∞∑k=1xkkp=Lip(x)
so that we have
∞∑k=1(xkH(p)k(1)kq+H(q)k(x)kp)=Lip(1)Liq(x)+Lip+q(x)
Note "added in proof"
The special case x=−1 of relation (10) can be uncovered (it is there more or less conceiled) from [2], page 33, where it is called "shuffle relation". We now have here an elementary proof of a generalization it.
Generalized relation with two parameters x and y
We can even go one final step further and write down this two-parametric symmetry relation
n∑k=1xkkqk∑m=1ymmp+n∑k=1ykkpk∑m=1xmmq=(n∑k=1xkkq)(n∑k=1ykkp)+n∑k=1(xy)kkp+q
This relation includes the various cases of alternating and non-alternating sums for apropriate choices of x and y.
In the limit n→∞ we obtain
∞∑k=1xkkqk∑m=1ymmp+∞∑k=1ykkpk∑m=1xmmq=Liq(x)Lip(y)+Lip+q(xy)
The zeta functions of (3) have been generalized to polylog functions.
Question
Prove (1), (6), (8), (11) and (12)
References
[1] Identities For Generalized Harmonic Number
[2] http://algo.inria.fr/flajolet/Publications/FlSa98.pdf
Answer
To prove (1) I will use summation by parts in the form given by
n∑k=1fkgk=fnGn−n−1∑k=1Gk(fk+1−fk),whereGn=n∑k=1gk.
Now consider the sum
n∑k=1H(p)kkq.
Let fk=H(p)k and gk=1/kq. So
Gn=n∑k=11kq=H(q)n,
and
fk+1−fk=H(p)k+1−H(p)k=(H(p)k+1(k+1)p)−H(p)k=1(k+1)p,
where we have made use of the following result for the generalised harmonic numbers
H(a)n+1=H(a)n+1(n+1)a.
On applying the summation by parts result to our sum we have
n∑k=1H(p)kkq=H(p)nH(q)n−n−1∑k=1H(q)k(k+1)p.
Shifting the index is the sum appearing to the right gives
n∑k=1H(p)kkq=H(p)nH(q)n−n∑k=2H(q)k−1kp =H(p)nH(q)n−n∑k=21kp(H(q)k−1kq)=H(p)nH(q)n−n∑k=2H(q)kkp+n∑k=21kp+q=H(p)nH(q)n−n∑k=1H(q)kkp+n∑k=11kp+q=H(p)nH(q)n−n∑k=1H(q)kkp+Hp+q)n
or after arranging
n∑k=1(H(p)kkq+H(q)kp)=H(p)n⋅H(q)n+H(p+q)n,
as required to show.
The result given by (6) can be proved in a similar fashion as to what was done above using summation by parts.
No comments:
Post a Comment