My doubt arises due to the following :
We know that the definition of the derivative of a function at a point x=a, if it is differentiable at a, is:
f′(a)=limh→0f(a+h)−f(a)h
Suppose that the function f(x) is differentiable in a finite interval [c,d] and a∈(c,d)
So, we can apply L'Hospital's rule. On differentiating numerator and denominator with respect to h, we get:
f′(a)=limh→0f(a+h)−f(a)h=limh→0f′(a+h)1
Which implies that
f′(a)=limh→0f′(a+h)
Which means that the function f′(x) is continuous at x=a
But this not necessarily true. A function may have a derivative everywhere but its derivative may not be continuous at some point. One of many counterexamples is:
f(x)={0 ; if x=0x2sin1x; if x ≠ 0
Whose derivative isn't continuous at 0
So, is something wrong with what I have done ? Or is it necessary that for applying L'Hospital's rule, the function's derivative must be a continuous function?
If the latter is true, why does that condition appear in the proof for L'Hospital's rule ?
Answer
In this case - yes, you need derivative to be continuous. In general, you need limf′(x)g′(x) to exist to apply L'Hospital's rule. As in your case g′(x)=1, you proved that if there is a limit of f′(a+h), then the limit is equal to f′(a).
No comments:
Post a Comment