Saturday, 14 September 2013

limits - Can we apply L'Hospital's rule where the derivative is not continuous?



My doubt arises due to the following :




We know that the definition of the derivative of a function at a point x=a, if it is differentiable at a, is:
f(a)=limh0f(a+h)f(a)h



Suppose that the function f(x) is differentiable in a finite interval [c,d] and a(c,d)



So, we can apply L'Hospital's rule. On differentiating numerator and denominator with respect to h, we get:
f(a)=limh0f(a+h)f(a)h=limh0f(a+h)1


Which implies that
f(a)=limh0f(a+h)


Which means that the function f(x) is continuous at x=a



But this not necessarily true. A function may have a derivative everywhere but its derivative may not be continuous at some point. One of many counterexamples is:
f(x)={0 ; if x=0x2sin1x; if x  0 


Whose derivative isn't continuous at 0



So, is something wrong with what I have done ? Or is it necessary that for applying L'Hospital's rule, the function's derivative must be a continuous function?



If the latter is true, why does that condition appear in the proof for L'Hospital's rule ?


Answer




In this case - yes, you need derivative to be continuous. In general, you need limf(x)g(x) to exist to apply L'Hospital's rule. As in your case g(x)=1, you proved that if there is a limit of f(a+h), then the limit is equal to f(a).


No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...