I'm reading Neal Carothers' Real Analysis, and he constructs a curve defined over [0,1] that fills the unit square as follows:
Let f be a real-valued function over [0,1] such that f is 0 over [0,13], 3t−1 over (13,23), and 1 over [23,1]. Now extend f over R by specifying that f is even and 2-periodic.
Here is the equation I don't understand: f(3kt)=f(0.(2ak)(2ak+1)(2ak+2)...)=ak if t is a number in the Cantor Set and 0.(2a0)(2a1)(2a2)... is the base 3 decimal expansion of t, where (2ai) is the (i+1)th digit in the expansion. Since it's base 3 and t is in the Cantor Set, each ai is either 0 or 1.
I tried to prove the equation by writing the decimal expansion as a series multiplied by 3k but I can't seem to make the math come out. In the book, Carothers prefaces the equation with "since f is periodic with period 2;" I don't know what to make of this hint since t is fixed.
Any help at all would be much appreciated!
Answer
We're in base 3, so multiplying by 3k shifts the decimal k digits to the right.
So f(3kt)=((2a0)(2a1)⋯(2ak−1).(2ak)(2ak+1)⋯). We also note that f has period 2, and that (2a0)(2a1)⋯(2ak−1) is an even number and is hence a multiple of the period of f.
So we are left with
f(3kt)=f(0.(2ak)(2ak+1)⋯)
Then if ak=0, we will have that 0.(0)(2ak+1)⋯=0 because (in base 3) it will be within the interval [0,13] and f is equal to 0 there (since that's how f was defined). On the other hand if ak=1, then we will have that 0.2(ak+1)⋯=1 (in base 3) since f was defined to be equal to 1 in the interval [23,1].
So if ak=0 then f(3kt)=ak=0, but if ak=1,then f(3kt)=ak=1, so either way we have that f(3kt)=ak.
No comments:
Post a Comment