Wednesday, 27 July 2016

calculus - How does one interpret dfracdxdy for a function which isn't invertible?

I was just going through the proof of derivative of inverse functions.



The statement reads:




If y=f(x) is a differentiable function of x such that it's inverse x=f1(y) exists, then x is a differentiable function of y and it's derivative is dxdy=1dydx,dydx0





Which naturally arises few questions, what if the inverse y=f(x) doesn't exist?



My Questions :









  1. Does dxdy still have a meaning?

  2. If so then what would it mean geometrically?

  3. Would dxdy=1dydx still hold? And if it does, then why do we even need the invertible condition in the statement?

No comments:

Post a Comment

real analysis - How to find limhrightarrow0fracsin(ha)h

How to find limh0sin(ha)h without lhopital rule? I know when I use lhopital I easy get $$ \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}...